This HTML5 document contains 43 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n17http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/subjekt/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n19http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F11%3A10103282%21RIV12-MSM-11230___/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n6http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F11%3A10103282%21RIV12-MSM-11230___
rdf:type
n11:Vysledek skos:Concept
rdfs:seeAlso
http://alppi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/pavleeva.pdf
dcterms:description
The ostentatious merging of national and imperial identities in modern Russian consciousness is considered one of the main reasons for the failure of Russian nation-building. The assumption that in Russia empire-building obstructed nation-building and that %22nation%22 and %22empire%22 were (and, from the point of view of many observers, still are) mingled in Russian national consciousness dominates contemporary historiography. The main goal of this article is not to refute this assumption, but to show that the conflict between these two categories had a more complex dynamism than is presented in most of the studies and to demonstrate how the analysis of such a controversial and subtle matter as national identity in a multiethnic empire may suffer from insensibility to historical nuances and careless generalizations. First of all, I analyze the new factors that cast doubt on the established relationships between %22national%22 and %22imperial%22 in scholarly literature and in previous theorizing on national identity in general. Secondly, referring to the period of late imperial Russia, I am trying to show that the simplified application of such dichotomies as %22russkii versus rossiiskii%22 or %22national versus imperial%22 is evidently ill-suited to the analysis of formation and development of Russian national identity and that the traditional ideal-typical models of the %22empire%22 and the %22nation-state%22 appear to be inappropriate for the description of a Russian specific situation, if one assumes the two concepts to be mutually exclusive. The ostentatious merging of national and imperial identities in modern Russian consciousness is considered one of the main reasons for the failure of Russian nation-building. The assumption that in Russia empire-building obstructed nation-building and that %22nation%22 and %22empire%22 were (and, from the point of view of many observers, still are) mingled in Russian national consciousness dominates contemporary historiography. The main goal of this article is not to refute this assumption, but to show that the conflict between these two categories had a more complex dynamism than is presented in most of the studies and to demonstrate how the analysis of such a controversial and subtle matter as national identity in a multiethnic empire may suffer from insensibility to historical nuances and careless generalizations. First of all, I analyze the new factors that cast doubt on the established relationships between %22national%22 and %22imperial%22 in scholarly literature and in previous theorizing on national identity in general. Secondly, referring to the period of late imperial Russia, I am trying to show that the simplified application of such dichotomies as %22russkii versus rossiiskii%22 or %22national versus imperial%22 is evidently ill-suited to the analysis of formation and development of Russian national identity and that the traditional ideal-typical models of the %22empire%22 and the %22nation-state%22 appear to be inappropriate for the description of a Russian specific situation, if one assumes the two concepts to be mutually exclusive.
dcterms:title
Russian national identity: beyond %22empire%22 versus %22nation%22 dichotomy Russian national identity: beyond %22empire%22 versus %22nation%22 dichotomy
skos:prefLabel
Russian national identity: beyond %22empire%22 versus %22nation%22 dichotomy Russian national identity: beyond %22empire%22 versus %22nation%22 dichotomy
skos:notation
RIV/00216208:11230/11:10103282!RIV12-MSM-11230___
n11:predkladatel
n15:orjk%3A11230
n4:aktivita
n10:I
n4:aktivity
I
n4:cisloPeriodika
1
n4:dodaniDat
n6:2012
n4:domaciTvurceVysledku
n16:4032152
n4:druhVysledku
n12:J
n4:duvernostUdaju
n13:S
n4:entitaPredkladatele
n19:predkladatel
n4:idSjednocenehoVysledku
227943
n4:idVysledku
RIV/00216208:11230/11:10103282
n4:jazykVysledku
n18:eng
n4:klicovaSlova
Dichotomy; Nation; versus; Empire; Beyond; Identity; National; Russian
n4:klicoveSlovo
n5:Beyond n5:Empire n5:Dichotomy n5:National n5:Russian n5:versus n5:Identity n5:Nation
n4:kodStatuVydavatele
CZ - Česká republika
n4:kontrolniKodProRIV
[767494D0D83E]
n4:nazevZdroje
The Annual of Language & Politics and Politics of Identity
n4:obor
n14:AB
n4:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n4:pocetTvurcuVysledku
1
n4:rokUplatneniVysledku
n6:2011
n4:svazekPeriodika
5
n4:tvurceVysledku
Pavleeva, Elena
s:issn
1803-1757
s:numberOfPages
16
n17:organizacniJednotka
11230