This HTML5 document contains 39 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n18http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n3http://purl.org/net/nknouf/ns/bibtex#
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F14%3A10284335%21RIV15-MSM-11220___/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
n14https://schema.org/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n19http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n5http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F14%3A10284335%21RIV15-MSM-11220___
rdf:type
skos:Concept n15:Vysledek
dcterms:description
The chapter analyses the judicial review of social welfare rights in the Czech Republic. Generally, the main methodology used by the Czech Constitutional Court for judicial review of fundamental rights is the proportionality test. For review of social and economic rights, however, the Court has developed a special methodology which is largely based on the rational basis review and shows a larger degree of deference towards the legislature. In the view of the Court, this difference in approach is necessary due to a specific nature of social rights which is underlined by a specific constitutional provision. The author argues that although a specific approach might be justified in the cases concerning social rights, the methodology used by the Court is inappropriate and rather a proportionality test should be used. To support this thesis, the constitutional setting and its origins is described, and then a landmark decision concerning the right to free medical care is explored and analyzed. On this basis, the author proposes an alternative approach to judicial review of social rights. The chapter analyses the judicial review of social welfare rights in the Czech Republic. Generally, the main methodology used by the Czech Constitutional Court for judicial review of fundamental rights is the proportionality test. For review of social and economic rights, however, the Court has developed a special methodology which is largely based on the rational basis review and shows a larger degree of deference towards the legislature. In the view of the Court, this difference in approach is necessary due to a specific nature of social rights which is underlined by a specific constitutional provision. The author argues that although a specific approach might be justified in the cases concerning social rights, the methodology used by the Court is inappropriate and rather a proportionality test should be used. To support this thesis, the constitutional setting and its origins is described, and then a landmark decision concerning the right to free medical care is explored and analyzed. On this basis, the author proposes an alternative approach to judicial review of social rights.
dcterms:title
Social Welfare Rights and Judicial Review: Czech Republic in Central European Context Social Welfare Rights and Judicial Review: Czech Republic in Central European Context
skos:prefLabel
Social Welfare Rights and Judicial Review: Czech Republic in Central European Context Social Welfare Rights and Judicial Review: Czech Republic in Central European Context
skos:notation
RIV/00216208:11220/14:10284335!RIV15-MSM-11220___
n4:aktivita
n19:I
n4:aktivity
I
n4:dodaniDat
n5:2015
n4:domaciTvurceVysledku
n9:5215935
n4:druhVysledku
n11:C
n4:duvernostUdaju
n16:S
n4:entitaPredkladatele
n17:predkladatel
n4:idSjednocenehoVysledku
45606
n4:idVysledku
RIV/00216208:11220/14:10284335
n4:jazykVysledku
n12:eng
n4:klicovaSlova
rational basis review; judicial review; Czech Republic; social welfare rights; social rights
n4:klicoveSlovo
n13:rational%20basis%20review n13:judicial%20review n13:Czech%20Republic n13:social%20welfare%20rights n13:social%20rights
n4:kontrolniKodProRIV
[55813701EA35]
n4:mistoVydani
Joacaba
n4:nazevEdiceCisloSvazku
Neuveden
n4:nazevZdroje
Mecanismos internacionais e internos de efetividade dos direitos fundamentais
n4:obor
n10:AG
n4:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n4:pocetStranKnihy
576
n4:pocetTvurcuVysledku
1
n4:rokUplatneniVysledku
n5:2014
n4:tvurceVysledku
Antoš, Marek
s:numberOfPages
13
n3:hasPublisher
Editora Unoesc
n14:isbn
978-85-8422-019-9
n18:organizacniJednotka
11220