This HTML5 document contains 90 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n10http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n19http://bibframe.org/vocab/
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F14%3A10290453%21RIV15-MSM-11210___/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n8http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F14%3A10290453%21RIV15-MSM-11210___
rdf:type
n18:Vysledek skos:Concept
rdfs:seeAlso
http://www.psycontent.com/content/n657m04571w51j70/fulltext.pdf
dcterms:description
Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, 10 effects replicated consistently. One effect - imagined contact reducing prejudice - showed weak support for replicability. And two effects - flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification - did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or US versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect. Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, 10 effects replicated consistently. One effect - imagined contact reducing prejudice - showed weak support for replicability. And two effects - flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification - did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or US versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.
dcterms:title
Investigating Variation in Replicability : A %22Many Labs%22 Replication Project Investigating Variation in Replicability : A %22Many Labs%22 Replication Project
skos:prefLabel
Investigating Variation in Replicability : A %22Many Labs%22 Replication Project Investigating Variation in Replicability : A %22Many Labs%22 Replication Project
skos:notation
RIV/00216208:11210/14:10290453!RIV15-MSM-11210___
n3:aktivita
n4:I
n3:aktivity
I
n3:cisloPeriodika
3
n3:dodaniDat
n8:2015
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n6:5608252
n3:druhVysledku
n16:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n15:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n5:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
22704
n3:idVysledku
RIV/00216208:11210/14:10290453
n3:jazykVysledku
n12:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
variation; cross-cultural; generalizability; reproducibility; replication
n3:klicoveSlovo
n13:variation n13:cross-cultural n13:generalizability n13:reproducibility n13:replication
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
DE - Spolková republika Německo
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[712D229D8787]
n3:nazevZdroje
Social Psychology
n3:obor
n9:AN
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
51
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n8:2014
n3:svazekPeriodika
45
n3:tvurceVysledku
Brumbaugh, Claudia Chloe Schmidt, Kathleen Kurtz, Jaime Bernstein, Michael J. Hovermale, James F. Krueger, Lacy E. Chandler, Jesse Brandt, Mark J. Nosek, Brian A. Vranka, Marek van ' t Veer, A. E. Huntsinger, Jeffrey R. IJzerman, Hans Bahnik, Stepan Ratliff, Kate A. Cemalcilar, Zeynep Levitan, Carmel A. Hicks, Joshua A. Pilati, Ronaldo Woodzicka, Julie A. Storbeck, Justin Van Swol, Lyn M. Mallett, Robyn K. Frankowska, Natalia Klein, Richard A. Vaughn, Leigh Ann Skorinko, Jeanine Thompson, Donna Nelson, Anthony J. Eisner, Matthew Kappes, Heather Barry Brooks, Beach Packard, Grant Steiner, Troy G. Galliani, Elisa Maria Bocian, Konrad Hunt, S. Jane Vianello, Michelangelo Devos, Thierry John, Melissa-Sue Cheong, Winnee Furrow, David Davis, William E. Rutchick, Abraham M. Adams, Reginald B. Morris, Wendy L. Nier, Jason A. Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A. Hasselman, Fred Smith, Robert Wichman, Aaron L.
s:issn
1864-9335
s:numberOfPages
11
n19:doi
10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
n10:organizacniJednotka
11210