This HTML5 document contains 42 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n12http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/projekt/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
n19http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/zamer/
shttp://schema.org/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F09%3A10070538%21RIV13-GA0-11210___/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n9http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F09%3A10070538%21RIV13-GA0-11210___
rdf:type
skos:Concept n18:Vysledek
dcterms:description
Contrary to the title of the article its autor is convinced that aesthetic value judgements can be justified. He thus plays here the role of devil's advocate by citing, strengthening and inventing arguments against the very posibility of their justification. The reason for this is that the author's conviction that such argument have not been fully confronted. The article is thus intended as a challenge: any theory of art evaluation, which assumes or tries to establish tha some works of art are objectively better than others and that aesthetic judgements are not just statements expressing personal likes and dislikes, schould show how such arguments can be refuted. Contrary to the title of the article its autor is convinced that aesthetic value judgements can be justified. He thus plays here the role of devil's advocate by citing, strengthening and inventing arguments against the very posibility of their justification. The reason for this is that the author's conviction that such argument have not been fully confronted. The article is thus intended as a challenge: any theory of art evaluation, which assumes or tries to establish tha some works of art are objectively better than others and that aesthetic judgements are not just statements expressing personal likes and dislikes, schould show how such arguments can be refuted.
dcterms:title
Why Aesthetic Value Judgements Cannot be Justified Why Aesthetic Value Judgements Cannot be Justified
skos:prefLabel
Why Aesthetic Value Judgements Cannot be Justified Why Aesthetic Value Judgements Cannot be Justified
skos:notation
RIV/00216208:11210/09:10070538!RIV13-GA0-11210___
n6:aktivita
n7:P n7:Z
n6:aktivity
P(GA408/07/0909), Z(MSM0021620824)
n6:cisloPeriodika
1
n6:dodaniDat
n9:2013
n6:domaciTvurceVysledku
n14:5883369
n6:druhVysledku
n8:J
n6:duvernostUdaju
n11:S
n6:entitaPredkladatele
n16:predkladatel
n6:idSjednocenehoVysledku
351919
n6:idVysledku
RIV/00216208:11210/09:10070538
n6:jazykVysledku
n17:eng
n6:klicovaSlova
Justified; Cannot; Judgements; Value; Aesthetic; Why
n6:klicoveSlovo
n10:Why n10:Cannot n10:Value n10:Aesthetic n10:Judgements n10:Justified
n6:kodStatuVydavatele
CZ - Česká republika
n6:kontrolniKodProRIV
[51E9AD274C5D]
n6:nazevZdroje
Estetika: časopis Ústavu dějin umění Akademie věd ČR
n6:obor
n15:AA
n6:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n6:pocetTvurcuVysledku
1
n6:projekt
n13:GA408%2F07%2F0909
n6:rokUplatneniVysledku
n9:2009
n6:svazekPeriodika
XLVI
n6:tvurceVysledku
Kulka, Tomáš
n6:zamer
n19:MSM0021620824
s:issn
0014-1291
s:numberOfPages
26
n12:organizacniJednotka
11210