This HTML5 document contains 56 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n19http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n18http://bibframe.org/vocab/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F00216208%3A11150%2F14%3A10281143%21RIV15-MSM-11150___/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n8http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F00216208%3A11150%2F14%3A10281143%21RIV15-MSM-11150___
rdf:type
n6:Vysledek skos:Concept
rdfs:seeAlso
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocs.12382/pdf
dcterms:description
Background:The aim of this study was to analyze short- and mid- term results after aortic valve (AV) repair with particular regard to the impact of valve cuspidity (bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve). Methods: One hundred patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) undergoing aortic valve repair between November 2007 and October 2012 were included in the study. Sixty patients had bicuspid AV (BAV group; 11 females) and 40 patients had tricuspid AV (TAV group; 13 females). AR > grade 2 was present in 47 (78%) patients in the BAV and in 35 (88%) patients in the TAV group. Follow-up was complete in 100% and median was 25 months. Results: lsolated aortic valve repair was performed in 27 (45%) of BAV patients and in six (15%) of TAV patients. Replacement of the ascending aorta and/or aortic root was performed in 33 (55%) of BAV patients and in 34 (86%) of TAV patients. There was no death within 30 days postoperatively, while two patients died (TAV group) during the follow-up period. There was no statistical difference between BAV and TAV groups with regard to the survival (100+- 0% vs. 95+- 4%, p = 0.102), the three-year freedom from AV-related reoperation (90+-5% vs.89+-6%, p=0.456), and the three-year freedom from AR grade>2 (86+-6% vs. 82 +- 7%, p = 0.866), respectively. Conclusions; This study demonstrates no difference in mid-term results after regurgitant bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve repair, suggesting that bicuspid valve may not be a risk factor for aortic valve repair. Background:The aim of this study was to analyze short- and mid- term results after aortic valve (AV) repair with particular regard to the impact of valve cuspidity (bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve). Methods: One hundred patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) undergoing aortic valve repair between November 2007 and October 2012 were included in the study. Sixty patients had bicuspid AV (BAV group; 11 females) and 40 patients had tricuspid AV (TAV group; 13 females). AR > grade 2 was present in 47 (78%) patients in the BAV and in 35 (88%) patients in the TAV group. Follow-up was complete in 100% and median was 25 months. Results: lsolated aortic valve repair was performed in 27 (45%) of BAV patients and in six (15%) of TAV patients. Replacement of the ascending aorta and/or aortic root was performed in 33 (55%) of BAV patients and in 34 (86%) of TAV patients. There was no death within 30 days postoperatively, while two patients died (TAV group) during the follow-up period. There was no statistical difference between BAV and TAV groups with regard to the survival (100+- 0% vs. 95+- 4%, p = 0.102), the three-year freedom from AV-related reoperation (90+-5% vs.89+-6%, p=0.456), and the three-year freedom from AR grade>2 (86+-6% vs. 82 +- 7%, p = 0.866), respectively. Conclusions; This study demonstrates no difference in mid-term results after regurgitant bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve repair, suggesting that bicuspid valve may not be a risk factor for aortic valve repair.
dcterms:title
Valve Cuspidity: A Risk Factor for Aortic Valve Repair? Valve Cuspidity: A Risk Factor for Aortic Valve Repair?
skos:prefLabel
Valve Cuspidity: A Risk Factor for Aortic Valve Repair? Valve Cuspidity: A Risk Factor for Aortic Valve Repair?
skos:notation
RIV/00216208:11150/14:10281143!RIV15-MSM-11150___
n3:aktivita
n12:I
n3:aktivity
I
n3:cisloPeriodika
5
n3:dodaniDat
n8:2015
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n4:3643034 n4:2536846 n4:4858077 n4:6647812 n4:5953081 n4:2102463 n4:7025041
n3:druhVysledku
n15:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n9:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n13:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
52949
n3:idVysledku
RIV/00216208:11150/14:10281143
n3:jazykVysledku
n17:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
outcome; surgery; aortic repair; tricuspid aortic valve; bicuspid aortic valve
n3:klicoveSlovo
n7:bicuspid%20aortic%20valve n7:aortic%20repair n7:tricuspid%20aortic%20valve n7:outcome n7:surgery
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
US - Spojené státy americké
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[EB1A2FFD2304]
n3:nazevZdroje
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
n3:obor
n16:FA
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
7
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
10
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n8:2014
n3:svazekPeriodika
29
n3:tvurceVysledku
Nedbal, Pavel Falk, Volkmar Dominik, Jan Tuna, Martin Vojáček, Jan Holubec, Tomáš Emmert, Maxmilian Y. Harrer, Jan Jamaliramin, Mostafa Žáček, Pavel
n3:wos
000342851100001
s:issn
0886-0440
s:numberOfPages
8
n18:doi
10.1111/jocs.12382
n19:organizacniJednotka
11150