This HTML5 document contains 54 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n14http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F14%3A10285459%21RIV15-MSM-11110___/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n5http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F14%3A10285459%21RIV15-MSM-11110___
rdf:type
n11:Vysledek skos:Concept
rdfs:seeAlso
http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/pdf/63/63_S309.pdf
dcterms:description
The aim was to compare methods of body fat measurement in different BMI groups. An additional aim was to discuss differences reflecting the structural and functional changes of fat tissue. The study group included 130 adult Caucasian women stratified by body mass index (BMI): 18-24.99 (n=30), 25-29.99 (n=26), 30-34.99 (n=33), 35-39.99 (n=30), and BMI }= 40 (n=11). Bioelectrical impedance was performed using Tanita TBF 410 GS, Bodystat 1500, and Omron BF 300. A caliper type Best was also applied. Correspondence of four methods with DEXA was assessed using the Bland-Altman and ANOVA analyses. Measurements by BIA were not significantly different from DEXA up to BMI of 30, but DEXA significantly overestimated in the higher BMI subgroup by all three methods. Caliper measurement significantly underestimated DEXA in all BMI subgroups. BIA methods overestimated DEXA for the obese subjects. Tanita did statistically the best. The Caliper test appeared less preferable than the BIA methods, especially in the higher BMI subgroup. DEXA and Caliper measurements seem to be the best estimate of structural (anatomical) fat quantity. We hypothesize that BIA methods could also measure some other physiopathological conditions like inflammation, hydration or cell infiltration of fat. The aim was to compare methods of body fat measurement in different BMI groups. An additional aim was to discuss differences reflecting the structural and functional changes of fat tissue. The study group included 130 adult Caucasian women stratified by body mass index (BMI): 18-24.99 (n=30), 25-29.99 (n=26), 30-34.99 (n=33), 35-39.99 (n=30), and BMI }= 40 (n=11). Bioelectrical impedance was performed using Tanita TBF 410 GS, Bodystat 1500, and Omron BF 300. A caliper type Best was also applied. Correspondence of four methods with DEXA was assessed using the Bland-Altman and ANOVA analyses. Measurements by BIA were not significantly different from DEXA up to BMI of 30, but DEXA significantly overestimated in the higher BMI subgroup by all three methods. Caliper measurement significantly underestimated DEXA in all BMI subgroups. BIA methods overestimated DEXA for the obese subjects. Tanita did statistically the best. The Caliper test appeared less preferable than the BIA methods, especially in the higher BMI subgroup. DEXA and Caliper measurements seem to be the best estimate of structural (anatomical) fat quantity. We hypothesize that BIA methods could also measure some other physiopathological conditions like inflammation, hydration or cell infiltration of fat.
dcterms:title
Does Impedance Measure a Functional State of the Body Fat? Does Impedance Measure a Functional State of the Body Fat?
skos:prefLabel
Does Impedance Measure a Functional State of the Body Fat? Does Impedance Measure a Functional State of the Body Fat?
skos:notation
RIV/00216208:11110/14:10285459!RIV15-MSM-11110___
n3:aktivita
n7:I n7:V
n3:aktivity
I, V
n3:cisloPeriodika
Suppl. 2
n3:dodaniDat
n5:2015
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n4:1591835 n4:8833826 n4:2410230 n4:1653202 n4:1249045 n4:8564043 n4:3102998
n3:druhVysledku
n9:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n17:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n16:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
12094
n3:idVysledku
RIV/00216208:11110/14:10285459
n3:jazykVysledku
n13:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
Fat tissue functional properties; Anthropometric methods; Obesity; Fat mass; DEXA; Body composition
n3:klicoveSlovo
n8:Fat%20mass n8:Obesity n8:Fat%20tissue%20functional%20properties n8:DEXA n8:Anthropometric%20methods n8:Body%20composition
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
CZ - Česká republika
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[DC57751FBE1D]
n3:nazevZdroje
Physiological Research
n3:obor
n18:FB
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
7
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
7
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n5:2014
n3:svazekPeriodika
63
n3:tvurceVysledku
Vilikus, Zdeněk Stránská, Zuzana Klaschka, Jan Svačina, Štěpán Svobodová, Šárka Matoulek, Martin Větrovská, Renata
n3:wos
000345590400008
s:issn
0862-8408
s:numberOfPages
12
n14:organizacniJednotka
11110