This HTML5 document contains 46 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F00027014%3A_____%2F12%3A%230001633%21RIV13-MZE-00027014/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n20http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/subjekt/
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/zamer/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n12http://bibframe.org/vocab/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n16http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F00027014%3A_____%2F12%3A%230001633%21RIV13-MZE-00027014
rdf:type
n14:Vysledek skos:Concept
rdfs:seeAlso
http://www.vuzv.cz/sites/File/_privat/12074.pdf
dcterms:description
Conclusions from narrative qualitative reviews on differences in total tract digestibilities between goats and sheep did not account for variability among studies. Therefore meta-analytic techniques were used to describe the magnitude of these differences with numerical values. A unitless effect size (Hedges g) was applied within studies to measure differences in digestibilities of dry matter (DM; 104 comparisons), organic matter (OM; 93 comparisons), crude protein (CP; 85 comparisons), neutral detergent fibre (NDF; 74 comparisons), acid detergent fibre (ADF; 59 comparisons), cellulose (24 comparisons), hemicellulose (18 comparisons) and gross energy (GE; 29 comparisons). The absence and inability to describe independent factors which contributed to variation among studies necessitated the use of frequentist random effects and hierarchical Bayesian models in the calculation of summary statistics across studies. Digestibilities of DM, OM, CP, NDF, ADF and hemicellulose were higher (p < 0.05) in goats than sheep when all-forage diets were fed. When concentrates were included in the diets, there were no such differences. Differences between goats and sheep in DM intake were found to be non-significant. Differences in nutrient digestibilities of forages as sole feed implies that species-specific values have to be used in feed formulation and feeding strategies. However, caution is needed when extrapolating results from stall-feeding, which is how digestibility data are usually measured, to grazing conditions. Conclusions from narrative qualitative reviews on differences in total tract digestibilities between goats and sheep did not account for variability among studies. Therefore meta-analytic techniques were used to describe the magnitude of these differences with numerical values. A unitless effect size (Hedges g) was applied within studies to measure differences in digestibilities of dry matter (DM; 104 comparisons), organic matter (OM; 93 comparisons), crude protein (CP; 85 comparisons), neutral detergent fibre (NDF; 74 comparisons), acid detergent fibre (ADF; 59 comparisons), cellulose (24 comparisons), hemicellulose (18 comparisons) and gross energy (GE; 29 comparisons). The absence and inability to describe independent factors which contributed to variation among studies necessitated the use of frequentist random effects and hierarchical Bayesian models in the calculation of summary statistics across studies. Digestibilities of DM, OM, CP, NDF, ADF and hemicellulose were higher (p < 0.05) in goats than sheep when all-forage diets were fed. When concentrates were included in the diets, there were no such differences. Differences between goats and sheep in DM intake were found to be non-significant. Differences in nutrient digestibilities of forages as sole feed implies that species-specific values have to be used in feed formulation and feeding strategies. However, caution is needed when extrapolating results from stall-feeding, which is how digestibility data are usually measured, to grazing conditions.
dcterms:title
Quantifying differences in total tract nutrient digestibilities between goats and sheep Quantifying differences in total tract nutrient digestibilities between goats and sheep
skos:prefLabel
Quantifying differences in total tract nutrient digestibilities between goats and sheep Quantifying differences in total tract nutrient digestibilities between goats and sheep
skos:notation
RIV/00027014:_____/12:#0001633!RIV13-MZE-00027014
n14:predkladatel
n20:ico%3A00027014
n4:aktivita
n15:Z
n4:aktivity
Z(MZE0002701404)
n4:cisloPeriodika
4
n4:dodaniDat
n16:2013
n4:domaciTvurceVysledku
n18:2006766 n18:6286194 n18:9587497
n4:druhVysledku
n6:J
n4:duvernostUdaju
n10:S
n4:entitaPredkladatele
n9:predkladatel
n4:idSjednocenehoVysledku
163794
n4:idVysledku
RIV/00027014:_____/12:#0001633
n4:jazykVysledku
n17:eng
n4:klicovaSlova
total tract digestibility, fibre, goats, sheep, meta-analysis
n4:klicoveSlovo
n7:goats n7:total%20tract%20digestibility n7:fibre n7:sheep n7:meta-analysis
n4:kodStatuVydavatele
DE - Spolková republika Německo
n4:kontrolniKodProRIV
[F0406598866A]
n4:nazevZdroje
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
n4:obor
n13:GH
n4:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
3
n4:pocetTvurcuVysledku
3
n4:rokUplatneniVysledku
n16:2012
n4:svazekPeriodika
96
n4:tvurceVysledku
Sales, James Jančík, Filip Homolka, Petr
n4:wos
000305970500016
n4:zamer
n8:MZE0002701404
s:issn
0931-2439
s:numberOfPages
11
n12:doi
10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01194.x