About: Different Approaches to Distributed Compilation

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Different Approaches to Distributed Compilation Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	skos:Concept http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek
rdfs:seeAlso	http://www.ipdps.org/ipdps2012/index.html
Description	Source code compiling is a non-trivial task that requires many computing resources. As a software project grows, its build time increases and debugging on a single computer becomes more and more time consuming task. An obvious solution would be a dedicated cluster acting as a build farm, where developers can send their requests. But in most cases, this solution has a very low utilization of available computing resources which makes it very ineffective. Therefore, we have focused on non-dedicated clusters to perform distributed compilation, where we could use users' computers as nodes of a build farm. We compare two different approaches: distcc, which is an open-source program to distribute compilation of C/C++ code between several computers on a network and Clondike, which is a universal peer-to-peer cluster that is being developed at the Czech Technical University in Prague. A very complex task able to test deeply both systems is a compilation of a Linux Kernel with many config options. We have run this task on a cluster with up to 20 computers and have measured computing times and CPU loads. In this paper, we will present the results of this experiment that indicate the scalability and utilization of given resources in both systems. We also discuss the penalty of a generic solution over a task-specific one. Source code compiling is a non-trivial task that requires many computing resources. As a software project grows, its build time increases and debugging on a single computer becomes more and more time consuming task. An obvious solution would be a dedicated cluster acting as a build farm, where developers can send their requests. But in most cases, this solution has a very low utilization of available computing resources which makes it very ineffective. Therefore, we have focused on non-dedicated clusters to perform distributed compilation, where we could use users' computers as nodes of a build farm. We compare two different approaches: distcc, which is an open-source program to distribute compilation of C/C++ code between several computers on a network and Clondike, which is a universal peer-to-peer cluster that is being developed at the Czech Technical University in Prague. A very complex task able to test deeply both systems is a compilation of a Linux Kernel with many config options. We have run this task on a cluster with up to 20 computers and have measured computing times and CPU loads. In this paper, we will present the results of this experiment that indicate the scalability and utilization of given resources in both systems. We also discuss the penalty of a generic solution over a task-specific one. (en)
Title	Different Approaches to Distributed Compilation Different Approaches to Distributed Compilation (en)
skos:prefLabel	Different Approaches to Distributed Compilation Different Approaches to Distributed Compilation (en)
skos:notation	RIV/68407700:21240/12:00205053!RIV14-MSM-21240___
http://linked.open...avai/predkladatel	Fakulta informačních technologií
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita	I S
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity	I, S
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat	2014
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku	Gattermayer, Josef Tvrdík, Pavel
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku	D - Článek ve sborníku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju	S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje nepodléhající ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele	České vysoké učení technické v Praze / Fakulta informačních technologií
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku	131234
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku	RIV/68407700:21240/12:00205053
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku	eng - angličtina
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova	Cluster computing; distributed compilation; scalability (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo	scalability Cluster computing distributed compilation
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV	[9D7B12D7AB78]
http://linked.open...v/mistoKonaniAkce	Shanghai
http://linked.open...i/riv/mistoVydani	Los Alamitos, CA
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje	Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops & PhD Forum (IPDPSW), 2012 IEEE 26th International
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor	IN
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku	2 (xsd:int)
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku	2 (xsd:int)
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku	2012
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku	Gattermayer, Josef Tvrdík, Pavel
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/typAkce	WRD - Světová
http://linked.open...ain/vavai/riv/wos	000309409400139
http://linked.open.../riv/zahajeniAkce	2012-05-21 (xsd:date)
number of pages	7 (xsd:int)
http://bibframe.org/vocab/doi	10.1109/IPDPSW.2012.137
http://purl.org/ne...btex#hasPublisher	IEEE Computer Soc.
https://schema.org/isbn	978-1-4673-0974-5
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka	21240

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 48 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software