Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
Description
| - Článek je odpovědí na myšlenky N. Miščeviče o problému apriornosti. Miščevič je skeptický k obsahu a použitelnosti teorie apriorních pravd. Diskutujeme tři oblasti uplatnění apriornosti a jejich užití. Nejprve připomínáme, že pojmový atomismus odmítá jakoukoliv pojmovou analýzu a úplně tak devalvuje představu apriornosti. potom tento postoj demonstrujeme na příkladu analýzy pojmové role vybraných pojmů přírodních druhů, jak je uvádí Miščevič. Nakonec analyzujeme místo negativních výroku, které podle všeho poznáváme apriorně. V závěru ukazujeme, že Miščevičův skeptický pohled na apriornost je legitimní v případe pozitivních, ne však negativních výroků. (cs)
- The article is a response to ideas of N. Miscevic on the issue of a priori. While Miscevic is skeptical of the content and usefulness of a priori truth, I am offering three distinct domains where the a priori has a different place. First, I am noting that conceptual atomism rejects concept constitution all together, making the notion of a priori empty. Second, I am supporting this claim by an analysis of conceptual role played by certain natural kind concepts as demonstrated by Miscevic. Finally, the role of negative claims, which we apparently know a priori, is evaluated. We conclude that dismissive attitude of Miscevic toward a priori is justified in cases of positive, but not negative statements.
- The article is a response to ideas of N. Miscevic on the issue of a priori. While Miscevic is skeptical of the content and usefulness of a priori truth, I am offering three distinct domains where the a priori has a different place. First, I am noting that conceptual atomism rejects concept constitution all together, making the notion of a priori empty. Second, I am supporting this claim by an analysis of conceptual role played by certain natural kind concepts as demonstrated by Miscevic. Finally, the role of negative claims, which we apparently know a priori, is evaluated. We conclude that dismissive attitude of Miscevic toward a priori is justified in cases of positive, but not negative statements. (en)
|
Title
| - Appropriating A priori
- Appropriating A priori (en)
- Vyhrazeno pro a priori (cs)
|
skos:prefLabel
| - Appropriating A priori
- Appropriating A priori (en)
- Vyhrazeno pro a priori (cs)
|
skos:notation
| - RIV/67985955:_____/06:00050865!RIV07-AV0-67985955
|
http://linked.open.../vavai/riv/strany
| |
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
| |
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
| |
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
| |
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
| |
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
| |
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
| |
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
| |
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
| - RIV/67985955:_____/06:00050865
|
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
| |
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
| - a priori; concept constitution; negative statements (en)
|
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
| |
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
| - HR - Chorvatská republika
|
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
| |
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
| - Croatian Journal of Philosophy
|
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
| |
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
| |
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...n/vavai/riv/zamer
| |
issn
| |
number of pages
| |
is http://linked.open...avai/riv/vysledek
of | |