About: Student’s subjective difficulty of calculus curriculum     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:seeAlso
Description
  • Mathematical knowledge can be distinguished into two types of curriculum, depending on evoked type of memory: the semantic memory and procedural memory. We assume that there are two boundary types of students: one preferring semantic memory learning and second preferring procedural memory learning. The aim of this study was to determine whether it is possible to identify two types of students based on the subjective assessment of difficulty .There are presented partial results of the project REFIMAT in this article.Can be students divided into several clusters based on their subjective assessment of difficulty of two types of curriculum? Do these clusters correspond with the expected types of memory used for two parts of curriculum? Are current results consistent with the results of previous study in subject of discreet math (Haviger, 2011)? Research method is questionnaire. Method of data analysis are descriptive analysis, cluster analysis, analysis of variance. Research sample: N=258 (2011y) + N=253 (2012y). Results: most students perceive the subject calculus as difficult or very difficult. It was founded that students can be divided into three types based on subjective assessment of difficulty. Identified types of students do not correspond with the expected two types of curriculum, depending on evoked type of memory.The research shows that Mathematics is perceived as highly difficult. This fact completely overlaps possible preferences of students to use different types of memory in subjective expressions. This result is fully consistent with the result of previous study.
  • Mathematical knowledge can be distinguished into two types of curriculum, depending on evoked type of memory: the semantic memory and procedural memory. We assume that there are two boundary types of students: one preferring semantic memory learning and second preferring procedural memory learning. The aim of this study was to determine whether it is possible to identify two types of students based on the subjective assessment of difficulty .There are presented partial results of the project REFIMAT in this article.Can be students divided into several clusters based on their subjective assessment of difficulty of two types of curriculum? Do these clusters correspond with the expected types of memory used for two parts of curriculum? Are current results consistent with the results of previous study in subject of discreet math (Haviger, 2011)? Research method is questionnaire. Method of data analysis are descriptive analysis, cluster analysis, analysis of variance. Research sample: N=258 (2011y) + N=253 (2012y). Results: most students perceive the subject calculus as difficult or very difficult. It was founded that students can be divided into three types based on subjective assessment of difficulty. Identified types of students do not correspond with the expected two types of curriculum, depending on evoked type of memory.The research shows that Mathematics is perceived as highly difficult. This fact completely overlaps possible preferences of students to use different types of memory in subjective expressions. This result is fully consistent with the result of previous study. (en)
Title
  • Student’s subjective difficulty of calculus curriculum
  • Student’s subjective difficulty of calculus curriculum (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • Student’s subjective difficulty of calculus curriculum
  • Student’s subjective difficulty of calculus curriculum (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/62690094:18450/12:50000754!RIV13-MSM-18450___
http://linked.open...avai/predkladatel
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • I
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
  • neuveden
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 171965
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/62690094:18450/12:50000754
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • statistical analysis; types of memory; types of math curriculum; calculus; Mathematical knowledge (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
  • NL - Nizozemsko
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [EC75DF1950A8]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
  • Procedia - social and behavioral sciences
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
  • 96
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Haviger, Jiří
  • Sedláček, Jan
issn
  • 1877-0428
number of pages
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
  • 18450
is http://linked.open...avai/riv/vysledek of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 77 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software