About: The effect of the different vineyard management to composition of weed species.     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
Description
  • The aim of the study was to define which kinds of weeds were occurred in selected vineyards in Žabčice and evaluated the differences in weed infestation in vineyards with different management. The first vineyard was divided to three parts: grassed space between rows, the part close to the vine trunk and cultivated space between rows. In this vineyard were done common works in growing season (cutting, etc.) and herbicides were applied. In the second vineyard were cultivated spaces between rows left to spontaneous grassing, application of herbicides was limited and common works in growing season weren't done. The evaluation was taken by phytocenological reléves in years 2013 and 2014. Obtained data were processed by multivariate analysis of ecological data. The most common species in the first vineyard were Bromus ordeaceus, Bromus inermis, Digitaria sanguinalis, Elytrigia repens, Erodium cicutarium, Euphorbia cyparissias, Fallopia convolvulus, Galium aparine, Geranium pusillum, Geum urbanum, Hordeum murinum, Chenopodium hybridum, Lamium purpureum, Lycopsis arvensis, Plantago major, Robinia pseudoacacia, Senecio vulgaris and Stellaria media. The most common species in the second vineyard were Bromus sp., Bromus tectorum, Calamagrostis epigejos, Convolvulus arvensis, Conyza canadensis, Cornus sanguinea, Echinochloa crus-galli, Epilobium ciliatum, Chenopodium album, Chenopodium pedunculare, Lactuca serriola, Plantago lanceolata, Potentilla argentea, Sambucus nigra, Taraxacum officinale, Tragopogon orientalis, Tripleurospermum inodorum and Viola arvensis.
  • The aim of the study was to define which kinds of weeds were occurred in selected vineyards in Žabčice and evaluated the differences in weed infestation in vineyards with different management. The first vineyard was divided to three parts: grassed space between rows, the part close to the vine trunk and cultivated space between rows. In this vineyard were done common works in growing season (cutting, etc.) and herbicides were applied. In the second vineyard were cultivated spaces between rows left to spontaneous grassing, application of herbicides was limited and common works in growing season weren't done. The evaluation was taken by phytocenological reléves in years 2013 and 2014. Obtained data were processed by multivariate analysis of ecological data. The most common species in the first vineyard were Bromus ordeaceus, Bromus inermis, Digitaria sanguinalis, Elytrigia repens, Erodium cicutarium, Euphorbia cyparissias, Fallopia convolvulus, Galium aparine, Geranium pusillum, Geum urbanum, Hordeum murinum, Chenopodium hybridum, Lamium purpureum, Lycopsis arvensis, Plantago major, Robinia pseudoacacia, Senecio vulgaris and Stellaria media. The most common species in the second vineyard were Bromus sp., Bromus tectorum, Calamagrostis epigejos, Convolvulus arvensis, Conyza canadensis, Cornus sanguinea, Echinochloa crus-galli, Epilobium ciliatum, Chenopodium album, Chenopodium pedunculare, Lactuca serriola, Plantago lanceolata, Potentilla argentea, Sambucus nigra, Taraxacum officinale, Tragopogon orientalis, Tripleurospermum inodorum and Viola arvensis. (en)
Title
  • The effect of the different vineyard management to composition of weed species.
  • The effect of the different vineyard management to composition of weed species. (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • The effect of the different vineyard management to composition of weed species.
  • The effect of the different vineyard management to composition of weed species. (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/62156489:43210/14:00229742!RIV15-MZE-43210___
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • P(QI111A184)
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 13549
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/62156489:43210/14:00229742
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • weeds; vineyards; biodiversity (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [605E00E95451]
http://linked.open...v/mistoKonaniAkce
  • Brno, Czech Republic
http://linked.open...i/riv/mistoVydani
  • Brno, Czech Republic
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
  • MendelNet 2014 - Proceedings of International PhD Students Conference
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Winkler, Jan
  • Porčová, Lenka
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/typAkce
http://linked.open.../riv/zahajeniAkce
number of pages
http://purl.org/ne...btex#hasPublisher
  • Mendel University in Brno
https://schema.org/isbn
  • 978-80-7509-174-1
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
  • 43210
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 58 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software