Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
Description
| - Humankind operates some relatively dangerous equipment. The basic reason why human society accepts their processing is the benefits such machinery brings. Their dangerousness rate is wrongly understood by the general public only as a consequence of a dangerous event. From the theory of dependability and risk controlling it is well known that risk is calculated as a combination of more factors, at least of consequences and the expected number of occurrences of unwanted events. The unwanted event could be the failure but also the false action of a safety system. The consequence of a false impact is economic loss resulting from process stoppage. More important impacts result from the no-action state of the safety system. The consequences are then not only economic, but there could also be exposure of human health and life. The frequency of the occurrence of such a dangerous failure is negligible, but the consequences could be many times greater than in the case of a safety failure. The dilemma facing systems related to safety is an area much focused on today. The number of international standards dealing with dependability, risk and safety confirms this statement. Producers and suppliers of safety systems resolve many problems related with the requirements of dependability standards. Problems are resolved in a scientific way, but some of them are resolved intuitively, based on a “technical feeling” and the experiences of the designers. This means that solutions for similar problems made by different designers are often diverse and there is no reason why their access was chosen. The submitted text focuses on the partial problem of choosing relevant data about a physical variable related to safety, where there exist more principles for the solution. To be more specific, this work deals with the problem of choosing the relevant value of a physical quantity with respect to reliability parameters and related long-term economic profitability of the chosen solution.
- Humankind operates some relatively dangerous equipment. The basic reason why human society accepts their processing is the benefits such machinery brings. Their dangerousness rate is wrongly understood by the general public only as a consequence of a dangerous event. From the theory of dependability and risk controlling it is well known that risk is calculated as a combination of more factors, at least of consequences and the expected number of occurrences of unwanted events. The unwanted event could be the failure but also the false action of a safety system. The consequence of a false impact is economic loss resulting from process stoppage. More important impacts result from the no-action state of the safety system. The consequences are then not only economic, but there could also be exposure of human health and life. The frequency of the occurrence of such a dangerous failure is negligible, but the consequences could be many times greater than in the case of a safety failure. The dilemma facing systems related to safety is an area much focused on today. The number of international standards dealing with dependability, risk and safety confirms this statement. Producers and suppliers of safety systems resolve many problems related with the requirements of dependability standards. Problems are resolved in a scientific way, but some of them are resolved intuitively, based on a “technical feeling” and the experiences of the designers. This means that solutions for similar problems made by different designers are often diverse and there is no reason why their access was chosen. The submitted text focuses on the partial problem of choosing relevant data about a physical variable related to safety, where there exist more principles for the solution. To be more specific, this work deals with the problem of choosing the relevant value of a physical quantity with respect to reliability parameters and related long-term economic profitability of the chosen solution. (en)
|
Title
| - Economic Evaluation of Commonly used Multiple Measurement Signal Processing Algorithms
- Economic Evaluation of Commonly used Multiple Measurement Signal Processing Algorithms (en)
|
skos:prefLabel
| - Economic Evaluation of Commonly used Multiple Measurement Signal Processing Algorithms
- Economic Evaluation of Commonly used Multiple Measurement Signal Processing Algorithms (en)
|
skos:notation
| - RIV/61989100:27650/13:86086410!RIV14-MSM-27650___
|
http://linked.open...avai/predkladatel
| |
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
| |
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
| |
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
| |
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
| |
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
| |
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
| |
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
| - RIV/61989100:27650/13:86086410
|
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
| |
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
| - economics of safety system; KooN system; safety system; risk; dependability; backup system (en)
|
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
| |
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
| |
http://linked.open...v/mistoKonaniAkce
| |
http://linked.open...i/riv/mistoVydani
| |
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
| - Recent advances in energy, environment and geology : proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Natural Resource Management (NRM'13) ... : Antalya, Turkey, October 8-10, 2013
|
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
| |
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
| |
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
| - Kamenický, Jan
- Zajíček, Jaroslav
|
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/typAkce
| |
http://linked.open.../riv/zahajeniAkce
| |
number of pages
| |
http://purl.org/ne...btex#hasPublisher
| |
https://schema.org/isbn
| |
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
| |