About: Concept of Foreign Arbitral Award in Connection with Recognition and Enforcement and Conflicts of Sources     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
Description
  • The term “foreign arbitral award” is crucial for the applicability of the respective rules on recognition and enforcement. Most national lex arbitri also lack any explicit definition. The practice in application of the New York Convention (1958) is of essential importance, mainly of its Article 1(1). New York Convention suggests that there are two types of foreign arbitral awards, namely: (i) arbitral awards rendered in the territory of a state other than the state of recognition, and (ii) arbitral awards that are not considered local (national, domestic) awards in the state in which their recognition is sought. The reason for this differentiation consists of the differences in interpretation of the status of arbitral award in different jurisdiction. The Convention employs two criteria, a territorial criterion (as the most important one) and a functional criterion. Although the Convention undoubtedly has major significance, we must not entirely dismiss bilateral treaties, such as legal assistance treaties, which also take precedence over laws of national origin. Any conflict between a [legal assistance] treaty and the New York Convention can be resolved either from the perspective of and with the use of the New York Convention and/or the particular treaty, or with the use of the general methods of resolving conflicts between the application of sources of international law (rules of international origin).
  • The term “foreign arbitral award” is crucial for the applicability of the respective rules on recognition and enforcement. Most national lex arbitri also lack any explicit definition. The practice in application of the New York Convention (1958) is of essential importance, mainly of its Article 1(1). New York Convention suggests that there are two types of foreign arbitral awards, namely: (i) arbitral awards rendered in the territory of a state other than the state of recognition, and (ii) arbitral awards that are not considered local (national, domestic) awards in the state in which their recognition is sought. The reason for this differentiation consists of the differences in interpretation of the status of arbitral award in different jurisdiction. The Convention employs two criteria, a territorial criterion (as the most important one) and a functional criterion. Although the Convention undoubtedly has major significance, we must not entirely dismiss bilateral treaties, such as legal assistance treaties, which also take precedence over laws of national origin. Any conflict between a [legal assistance] treaty and the New York Convention can be resolved either from the perspective of and with the use of the New York Convention and/or the particular treaty, or with the use of the general methods of resolving conflicts between the application of sources of international law (rules of international origin). (en)
Title
  • Concept of Foreign Arbitral Award in Connection with Recognition and Enforcement and Conflicts of Sources
  • Concept of Foreign Arbitral Award in Connection with Recognition and Enforcement and Conflicts of Sources (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • Concept of Foreign Arbitral Award in Connection with Recognition and Enforcement and Conflicts of Sources
  • Concept of Foreign Arbitral Award in Connection with Recognition and Enforcement and Conflicts of Sources (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/61989100:27510/13:86088191!RIV14-MSM-27510___
http://linked.open...avai/predkladatel
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • V
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
  • 2
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 66639
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/61989100:27510/13:86088191
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • decision in merits; procedural decision; sources of international law; privat international law; foreign award; domestic award; enforcement; recognition; New York Convention; arbitral award; arbitration (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
  • RO - Rumunsko
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [F14B4E2BE0F0]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
  • Romanian Journal of Arbitration
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
  • 26
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Bělohlávek, Alexander
issn
  • 1842-6859
number of pages
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
  • 27510
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 48 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software