| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| Description
| - The correct and effective interventions in the processes, quality of their management and continuous improvement are one of the basic assumptions for the success of companies not only in the metallurgical industry. Successful fulfillment of these assumptions can’t be achieved without quality measured data of important quality characteristics of the product and process, which provides only acceptable measurement system. For that reason the analysis of the most important properties of measurement systems (e.g. stability, bias, repeatability, reproducibility etc.) must be one of the integral part of quality planning activities. The acceptability of the measurement system is currently assessed with using results of combined gage repeatability and reproducibility study (GRR). The most used methods for evaluation of GRR study is a average and range method (A&R) and analysis of variance (ANOVA). In the latest editions of guides for the measurement system analysis is the ANOVA method still more preferred method for evaluating the acceptability of measurement system. Some practical experience lead to the conclusion that results obtained with both methods can be significantly different. It can lead to different conclusions about the quality of the used measurement system. The purpose of this paper is the analysis of results obtained with using both methods for various practical situations. The results of this paper will lead to more precise determination of the differences and weaknesses of both methods in order to improve the reliability of the results of gage repeatability and reproducibility study.
- The correct and effective interventions in the processes, quality of their management and continuous improvement are one of the basic assumptions for the success of companies not only in the metallurgical industry. Successful fulfillment of these assumptions can’t be achieved without quality measured data of important quality characteristics of the product and process, which provides only acceptable measurement system. For that reason the analysis of the most important properties of measurement systems (e.g. stability, bias, repeatability, reproducibility etc.) must be one of the integral part of quality planning activities. The acceptability of the measurement system is currently assessed with using results of combined gage repeatability and reproducibility study (GRR). The most used methods for evaluation of GRR study is a average and range method (A&R) and analysis of variance (ANOVA). In the latest editions of guides for the measurement system analysis is the ANOVA method still more preferred method for evaluating the acceptability of measurement system. Some practical experience lead to the conclusion that results obtained with both methods can be significantly different. It can lead to different conclusions about the quality of the used measurement system. The purpose of this paper is the analysis of results obtained with using both methods for various practical situations. The results of this paper will lead to more precise determination of the differences and weaknesses of both methods in order to improve the reliability of the results of gage repeatability and reproducibility study. (en)
|
| Title
| - Influence of Used Method on the Results of Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility Study
- Influence of Used Method on the Results of Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility Study (en)
|
| skos:prefLabel
| - Influence of Used Method on the Results of Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility Study
- Influence of Used Method on the Results of Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility Study (en)
|
| skos:notation
| - RIV/61989100:27360/12:86084329!RIV13-MSM-27360___
|
| http://linked.open...avai/predkladatel
| |
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
| |
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
| |
| http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
| |
| http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
| |
| http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
| |
| http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
| - RIV/61989100:27360/12:86084329
|
| http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
| - Measurement, repeatability, reproducibility, interaction, range method, average and range method, ANOVA (en)
|
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
| |
| http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
| |
| http://linked.open...v/mistoKonaniAkce
| |
| http://linked.open...i/riv/mistoVydani
| |
| http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
| - METAL 2012 : 21st International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials : conference proceedings
|
| http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
| |
| http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
| - Plura, Jiří
- Klaput, Pavel
|
| http://linked.open...vavai/riv/typAkce
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/zahajeniAkce
| |
| number of pages
| |
| http://purl.org/ne...btex#hasPublisher
| |
| https://schema.org/isbn
| |
| http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
| |
| is http://linked.open...avai/riv/vysledek
of | |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)