| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| Description
| - V roce 1934 Cohen a Nagel upozornili na tzv. paradox inference. Tento paradox úzce souvisí s problémem informativnosti analyticky či logicky pravdivých tvrzení. Klasická teorie sémantické informace (ESI) tak, jak ji formulovali Bar-Hillel a Carnap v r. 1952, tyto problémy uspokojivě neřeší. Podle ESI platí, že závěr platného úsudku je obsažen v jeho předpokladech, a tedy nepřináší žádnou novou informaci. Podobně analyticky či logicky platné věty nemají dle ESI informační obsah. V r. 1970 pojmenoval Hintikka tento problém a selhání ESI jej řešit jako skandál dedukce. Učinil pokus definovat míru informace pomocí rozlišení mezi hloubkovou a povrchovou informací. Avšak v současné době Sequoiah-Grayson ukázal, že Hintikkův pokus byl neúspěšný. V tomto článku navrhujeme řešení založené na rozdílu mezi empirickou a analytickou informací. Deklarativní (empirické, analytické nebo matematické) věty jsou informativní díky svému významu; mají tedy analytický informační obsah. V článku analyzujeme strukturované vý (cs)
- In 1934 Cohen and Nagel put forward the well-known paradox of inference. The paradox is closely related to the problem of the informational yield of analytically and/or logically true sentences. The classical theory of semantic information (ESI), as formulated by Bar-Hillel and Carnap in 1952, does not give a satisfactory account of the problem of what information, if any, analytically and/or logically true sentences have to offer. According to ESI, the conclusion of a valid argument is contained in the premises, and thus does not convey any novel information, and analytically/logically true sentences lack informational content. In 1970 Hintikka dubbed the failure of ESI to give an account of the informational yield of deductive inferences ?the scandal of deduction?. He made an attempt to obtain a measure of the informational yield by distinguishing between depth information and surface information. However, recently Sequoiah-Grayson has shown that Hintikka?s attempt fails. In this paper we propose a
- In 1934 Cohen and Nagel put forward the well-known paradox of inference. The paradox is closely related to the problem of the informational yield of analytically and/or logically true sentences. The classical theory of semantic information (ESI), as formulated by Bar-Hillel and Carnap in 1952, does not give a satisfactory account of the problem of what information, if any, analytically and/or logically true sentences have to offer. According to ESI, the conclusion of a valid argument is contained in the premises, and thus does not convey any novel information, and analytically/logically true sentences lack informational content. In 1970 Hintikka dubbed the failure of ESI to give an account of the informational yield of deductive inferences ?the scandal of deduction?. He made an attempt to obtain a measure of the informational yield by distinguishing between depth information and surface information. However, recently Sequoiah-Grayson has shown that Hintikka?s attempt fails. In this paper we propose a (en)
|
| Title
| - Semantic Information and the Paradox of Inference
- Semantic Information and the Paradox of Inference (en)
- Sémantická informace a paradox inference (cs)
|
| skos:prefLabel
| - Semantic Information and the Paradox of Inference
- Semantic Information and the Paradox of Inference (en)
- Sémantická informace a paradox inference (cs)
|
| skos:notation
| - RIV/61989100:27240/08:00018815!RIV09-GA0-27240___
|
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
| |
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
| |
| http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
| |
| http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
| |
| http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
| |
| http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
| - RIV/61989100:27240/08:00018815
|
| http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
| - Semantic information; paradox of inference; analytic/empirical information; Transparent Intensional Logic (TIL); construction; structured meaning. (en)
|
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
| |
| http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
| |
| http://linked.open...v/mistoKonaniAkce
| |
| http://linked.open...i/riv/mistoVydani
| |
| http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
| - Jednotliviny, všeobecniny, významy
|
| http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
| |
| http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
| |
| http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...vavai/riv/typAkce
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/zahajeniAkce
| |
| number of pages
| |
| http://purl.org/ne...btex#hasPublisher
| |
| https://schema.org/isbn
| |
| http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
| |
| is http://linked.open...avai/riv/vysledek
of | |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)