About: A simple method to correct the results of acoustic surveys for fish hidden in the dead zone     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
Description
  • In lentic freshwater systems, vertical acoustics may underestimate fish abundance in the acoustic dead zone where fish detection capability is limited. To estimate this bias, the height of fish above the lead-line of a benthic multi-mesh gillnet (1.5 m high) was used to quantify both the vertical distribution of fish near the bottom and the proportion residing within the acoustic dead zone. The study was carried out at the percid-dominated Biesbosch Reservoirs in the Netherlands. Acoustic dead zones were estimated at 7 cm above flat bottoms, and 12–34 cm above 8° sloped bottoms at depths of 5–27 m, respectively. Depending on the habitat, 36 to 75% of the gillnet catch by number was present in the acoustic dead zone, representing 5–51% of the biomass. Near-bottom depths were highly preferred by ruffe Gymnocephalus cernua, often used by perch Perca fluviatilis and pikeperch Sander lucioperca, plus seemingly devoid of smelt Osmerus eperlanus. The total amount of fish hidden in the acoustic dead zone was estimated to be 13–39% of the whole water column. The proportion of biomass obscured in the dead zone was lower (1–12%). The conclusion is that undetected fish in the acoustic dead zone can seriously bias density assessment, which can be corrected by concurrent sampling with benthic gillnets.
  • In lentic freshwater systems, vertical acoustics may underestimate fish abundance in the acoustic dead zone where fish detection capability is limited. To estimate this bias, the height of fish above the lead-line of a benthic multi-mesh gillnet (1.5 m high) was used to quantify both the vertical distribution of fish near the bottom and the proportion residing within the acoustic dead zone. The study was carried out at the percid-dominated Biesbosch Reservoirs in the Netherlands. Acoustic dead zones were estimated at 7 cm above flat bottoms, and 12–34 cm above 8° sloped bottoms at depths of 5–27 m, respectively. Depending on the habitat, 36 to 75% of the gillnet catch by number was present in the acoustic dead zone, representing 5–51% of the biomass. Near-bottom depths were highly preferred by ruffe Gymnocephalus cernua, often used by perch Perca fluviatilis and pikeperch Sander lucioperca, plus seemingly devoid of smelt Osmerus eperlanus. The total amount of fish hidden in the acoustic dead zone was estimated to be 13–39% of the whole water column. The proportion of biomass obscured in the dead zone was lower (1–12%). The conclusion is that undetected fish in the acoustic dead zone can seriously bias density assessment, which can be corrected by concurrent sampling with benthic gillnets. (en)
Title
  • A simple method to correct the results of acoustic surveys for fish hidden in the dead zone
  • A simple method to correct the results of acoustic surveys for fish hidden in the dead zone (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • A simple method to correct the results of acoustic surveys for fish hidden in the dead zone
  • A simple method to correct the results of acoustic surveys for fish hidden in the dead zone (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/60077344:_____/13:00392325!RIV14-AV0-60077344
http://linked.open...avai/predkladatel
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • I, P(QH81046), S
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
  • 2
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 59065
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/60077344:_____/13:00392325
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • acoustic dead zone; benthic gillnet; freshwater benthic habitats; bottom slope (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
  • DE - Spolková republika Německo
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [80113C7D5DC4]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
  • Journal of Applied Ichthyology
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
  • 29
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Kubečka, Jan
  • Mrkvička, Tomáš
  • Peterka, Jiří
  • Prchalová, Marie
  • Čech, Martin
  • Frouzová, Jaroslava
  • Draštík, Vladislav
  • Jůza, Tomáš
  • Kratochvíl, Michal
  • Tušer, Michal
  • Vašek, Mojmír
http://linked.open...ain/vavai/riv/wos
  • 000316223900008
issn
  • 0175-8659
number of pages
http://bibframe.org/vocab/doi
  • 10.1111/jai.12091
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 112 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software