About: How to assess reliability and validity of a traffic conflict technique?     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:seeAlso
Description
  • Traffic conflicts are one of indirect safety measures. In order of their description, collection and evaluation, number of various traffic conflict techniques (TCTs) has been developed since the end of 1960s. The two key properties of every indicator are (Laureshyn, 2010) reliability and validity. The question is: is there a practical way to assess reliability and validity of a traffic conflict technique? It has been asked in relation with establishment of Czech TCT. There have been two Czech TCT approaches, both used mainly in academia: one has utilised manual observations, the second has relied on video recording and analysis in the office (Ambros, 2011). Current task is to compare the both and draw conclusions with regards to their applicability in practice. (presented at 25th ICTCT workshop)
  • Traffic conflicts are one of indirect safety measures. In order of their description, collection and evaluation, number of various traffic conflict techniques (TCTs) has been developed since the end of 1960s. The two key properties of every indicator are (Laureshyn, 2010) reliability and validity. The question is: is there a practical way to assess reliability and validity of a traffic conflict technique? It has been asked in relation with establishment of Czech TCT. There have been two Czech TCT approaches, both used mainly in academia: one has utilised manual observations, the second has relied on video recording and analysis in the office (Ambros, 2011). Current task is to compare the both and draw conclusions with regards to their applicability in practice. (presented at 25th ICTCT workshop) (en)
Title
  • How to assess reliability and validity of a traffic conflict technique?
  • How to assess reliability and validity of a traffic conflict technique? (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • How to assess reliability and validity of a traffic conflict technique?
  • How to assess reliability and validity of a traffic conflict technique? (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/44994575:_____/12:#0001101!RIV14-TA0-44994575
http://linked.open...avai/predkladatel
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • P(ED2.1.00/03.0064), P(TA01030096)
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 139693
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/44994575:_____/12:#0001101
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • road safety; traffic conflict (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [02434F4AA2C3]
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Ambros, Jiří
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.116 as of Feb 22 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3239 as of Feb 22 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 82 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software