About: Monitoring biventricular pacing parameters depending on the left ventricle lead configuration     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:seeAlso
Description
  • OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether pacing or sensing configuration has an effect on pacing parameters or their time progression. Three left ventricular (LV) pacing parameters were monitored - the LV pacing threshold, pacing impedance and intrinsic R-wave amplitude. METHODS: Data were collected at three intervals: during implantation; between the second and fifth month after implantation (first follow-up); and between the eighth and 15th month after implantation (second follow-up). Repeated-measures ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: The impedance, but not its time progression, was significantly higher for the LV tip to LV ring configuration than for other configurations. R-wave amplitude and impedance increased significantly (without dependance on configurations) between implantation and first follow-up, as expected. The time progression of any parameter was not dependent on configuration of the LV lead. CONCLUSIONS: LV tip to LV ring is the best configuration for maintaining a high impedance level. It is better to maintain an individual approach for pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude, and their settings.
  • OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether pacing or sensing configuration has an effect on pacing parameters or their time progression. Three left ventricular (LV) pacing parameters were monitored - the LV pacing threshold, pacing impedance and intrinsic R-wave amplitude. METHODS: Data were collected at three intervals: during implantation; between the second and fifth month after implantation (first follow-up); and between the eighth and 15th month after implantation (second follow-up). Repeated-measures ANOVA was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: The impedance, but not its time progression, was significantly higher for the LV tip to LV ring configuration than for other configurations. R-wave amplitude and impedance increased significantly (without dependance on configurations) between implantation and first follow-up, as expected. The time progression of any parameter was not dependent on configuration of the LV lead. CONCLUSIONS: LV tip to LV ring is the best configuration for maintaining a high impedance level. It is better to maintain an individual approach for pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude, and their settings. (en)
Title
  • Monitoring biventricular pacing parameters depending on the left ventricle lead configuration
  • Monitoring biventricular pacing parameters depending on the left ventricle lead configuration (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • Monitoring biventricular pacing parameters depending on the left ventricle lead configuration
  • Monitoring biventricular pacing parameters depending on the left ventricle lead configuration (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/00216208:11110/13:10191113!RIV14-MSM-11110___
http://linked.open...avai/predkladatel
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • N
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
  • 2
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 89394
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/00216208:11110/13:10191113
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • R-wave voltage; Repeated measures ANOVA; Left ventricular pacing threshold; Impedance; Cardiac resynchronization therapy (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
  • CA - Kanada
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [008579DE43A0]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
  • Experimental and Clinical Cardiology
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
  • 18
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Korpas, David
  • Procházka, Antonín
http://linked.open...ain/vavai/riv/wos
  • 000322439400016
issn
  • 1205-6626
number of pages
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
  • 11110
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 76 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software