About: How does successful bridging with ventricular assist device affect cardiac transplantation outcome?     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
Description
  • A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The issue was to determine the impact of bridge-to-transplant ventricular assist device support on survival after cardiac transplantation. Altogether 428 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. The treatment options for patients with advanced heart failure or those with deteriorating end-organ function on maximal medical therapy are limited to intravenous inotropes and mechanical assistance with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or ventricular assist device (VAD). Studies exploring the effect of VADs on post-transplant mortality have yielded conflicting results. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation continues to identify mechanical support as a risk factor for decreased survival after transplantation. A limitation of this report is that the multivariable adjustment uses variables recorded not at the time of device implant but at the time of transplant. Some of the recipient characteristics thus may be altered by the device implant. Compared with the previous reports the latest data show improvement in post-transplant survival in the recent era. In addition, the excess risk appears to be limited to the early post-transplant period. Experienced centers consistently report outstanding post-transplant results with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) bridging. Of the 12 papers seven showed no difference in survival, and five showed a reduced survival. In the papers showing no difference, one year survival averaged from 85% in supported patients to 87% in non-supported patients. In papers reporting a difference in outcome, one year averaged survival was 74% in LVAD recipients compared to 90% in non-bridged patients. De
  • A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The issue was to determine the impact of bridge-to-transplant ventricular assist device support on survival after cardiac transplantation. Altogether 428 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. The treatment options for patients with advanced heart failure or those with deteriorating end-organ function on maximal medical therapy are limited to intravenous inotropes and mechanical assistance with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or ventricular assist device (VAD). Studies exploring the effect of VADs on post-transplant mortality have yielded conflicting results. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation continues to identify mechanical support as a risk factor for decreased survival after transplantation. A limitation of this report is that the multivariable adjustment uses variables recorded not at the time of device implant but at the time of transplant. Some of the recipient characteristics thus may be altered by the device implant. Compared with the previous reports the latest data show improvement in post-transplant survival in the recent era. In addition, the excess risk appears to be limited to the early post-transplant period. Experienced centers consistently report outstanding post-transplant results with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) bridging. Of the 12 papers seven showed no difference in survival, and five showed a reduced survival. In the papers showing no difference, one year survival averaged from 85% in supported patients to 87% in non-supported patients. In papers reporting a difference in outcome, one year averaged survival was 74% in LVAD recipients compared to 90% in non-bridged patients. De (en)
Title
  • How does successful bridging with ventricular assist device affect cardiac transplantation outcome?
  • How does successful bridging with ventricular assist device affect cardiac transplantation outcome? (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • How does successful bridging with ventricular assist device affect cardiac transplantation outcome?
  • How does successful bridging with ventricular assist device affect cardiac transplantation outcome? (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/00023001:_____/11:00002673!RIV12-MZ0-00023001
http://linked.open...avai/predkladatel
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • V
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
  • 4
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 202796
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/00023001:_____/11:00002673
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • Ventricular assist device; Mechanical support; Transplantation (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
  • NL - Nizozemsko
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [EF97AB3D72D8]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
  • Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
  • 13
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Dorazilová, Zora
  • Netuka, Ivan
  • Pirk, Jan
  • Urban, Marian
issn
  • 1569-9293
number of pages
is http://linked.open...avai/riv/vysledek of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 85 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software