About: Science versus Design; comparable, contrastive or conducive?

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Science versus Design; comparable, contrastive or conducive? Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	skos:Concept http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek
rdfs:seeAlso	http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616113000246
Description	Science and design are two completely separated areas of expertise with their own specialists. Science analyses the existing world to create new knowledge, design uses existing knowledge to create a new world. This tunnel-vision mentality and narrow-minded approach is dangerous for problem solving, where a broad view on potential solutions is required to realise a high-quality answer on the defined problem. We state that design benefits from scientific methods, resulting in a more effective design process and in better products, while science benefits from a design approach, resulting in more efficient and effective results. Our philosophy is illustrated using examples from the field of biomedical engineering. Both methods can benefit tremendously from each other. By applying scientific methods, superior choices will be made in the design process. With design, more accurate, effective and efficient science will be performed. Science and design are two completely separated areas of expertise with their own specialists. Science analyses the existing world to create new knowledge, design uses existing knowledge to create a new world. This tunnel-vision mentality and narrow-minded approach is dangerous for problem solving, where a broad view on potential solutions is required to realise a high-quality answer on the defined problem. We state that design benefits from scientific methods, resulting in a more effective design process and in better products, while science benefits from a design approach, resulting in more efficient and effective results. Our philosophy is illustrated using examples from the field of biomedical engineering. Both methods can benefit tremendously from each other. By applying scientific methods, superior choices will be made in the design process. With design, more accurate, effective and efficient science will be performed. (en)
Title	Science versus Design; comparable, contrastive or conducive? Science versus Design; comparable, contrastive or conducive? (en)
skos:prefLabel	Science versus Design; comparable, contrastive or conducive? Science versus Design; comparable, contrastive or conducive? (en)
skos:notation	RIV/68407700:21460/13:00201609!RIV14-MSM-21460___
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita	I S
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity	I, S
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika	May
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat	2014
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku	Rogalewicz, Vladimír
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku	J - Článek v odborném periodiku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju	S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje nepodléhající ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele	České vysoké učení technické v Praze / Fakulta biomedicínského inženýrství
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku	104104
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku	RIV/68407700:21460/13:00201609
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku	eng - angličtina
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova	Engineering education; Specialization; Multidisciplinarity; methodical design (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo	Specialization methodical design Engineering education Multidisciplinarity
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele	NL - Nizozemsko
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV	[AA31B540B20E]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje	Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor	FS
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku	1 (xsd:int)
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku	12 (xsd:int)
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku	2013
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika	21
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku	Mottaghy, K. Reilly, R. Rogalewicz, Vladimír Segers, P. Verkerke, G. J. Catapano, G. Broekhuis, A. A. Burša, J. McCullagh, P. Niederer, P. Verdonschot, N. van der Houwen, E. B.
http://linked.open...ain/vavai/riv/wos	000318837500019
issn	1751-6161
number of pages	7 (xsd:int)
http://bibframe.org/vocab/doi	10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.009
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka	21460

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 58 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software