| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| Description
| - During 2009 and 2010, 23 night-time mosquito captures were made at Kančí obora in south-eastern Moravia, Czech Republic. It was used in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) miniature light traps with CO2 (dry ice) and baited lard-can traps in which sentinel animals were replaced with a container filled with CO2 (dry ice). In the observed period, a total of 31,882 female mosquitoes were captured by CDC miniature light traps with CO2. Lard-can traps baited with CO2 captured 995 females under the same conditions, which is just 3.12% of the quantity from the CDC traps. At the same time, there were significant differences in the proportional captures of various species. Compared to CDC miniature light traps, baited lard-can traps much more often captured Aedes cinereus (16.58% of total versus 1.93% in CDC traps), Culex modestus (15.48% versus 4.62%), and Ae. rossicus (6.13% versus 2.67%). On the other hand, capture of female Ae. vexans was proportionally much lower (15.38% versus 36.41%). Capture of Cx. pipiens was more or less the same 14.77% (miniature light traps) and 15.76% (baited lard-can traps). The occurrence of the calamity species Ae. sticticus was proportionally very high in both trap types (30.05% in lard-can traps baited with CO2, 33.58% in CDC miniature light traps). The findings prove that a trap’s design itself significantly affects not only the overall capture of mosquitoes but also the proportional representation of individual species.
- During 2009 and 2010, 23 night-time mosquito captures were made at Kančí obora in south-eastern Moravia, Czech Republic. It was used in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) miniature light traps with CO2 (dry ice) and baited lard-can traps in which sentinel animals were replaced with a container filled with CO2 (dry ice). In the observed period, a total of 31,882 female mosquitoes were captured by CDC miniature light traps with CO2. Lard-can traps baited with CO2 captured 995 females under the same conditions, which is just 3.12% of the quantity from the CDC traps. At the same time, there were significant differences in the proportional captures of various species. Compared to CDC miniature light traps, baited lard-can traps much more often captured Aedes cinereus (16.58% of total versus 1.93% in CDC traps), Culex modestus (15.48% versus 4.62%), and Ae. rossicus (6.13% versus 2.67%). On the other hand, capture of female Ae. vexans was proportionally much lower (15.38% versus 36.41%). Capture of Cx. pipiens was more or less the same 14.77% (miniature light traps) and 15.76% (baited lard-can traps). The occurrence of the calamity species Ae. sticticus was proportionally very high in both trap types (30.05% in lard-can traps baited with CO2, 33.58% in CDC miniature light traps). The findings prove that a trap’s design itself significantly affects not only the overall capture of mosquitoes but also the proportional representation of individual species. (en)
|
| Title
| - Influence of trap construction on mosquito capture
- Influence of trap construction on mosquito capture (en)
|
| skos:prefLabel
| - Influence of trap construction on mosquito capture
- Influence of trap construction on mosquito capture (en)
|
| skos:notation
| - RIV/68081766:_____/12:00376549!RIV13-AV0-68081766
|
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
| |
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
| - I, P(2B08003), Z(AV0Z50070508)
|
| http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
| |
| http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
| |
| http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
| |
| http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
| |
| http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
| - RIV/68081766:_____/12:00376549
|
| http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
| - CDC miniature light traps; baited lard-can traps; mosquitoes (en)
|
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
| |
| http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
| - US - Spojené státy americké
|
| http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
| |
| http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
| |
| http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
| |
| http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
| |
| http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
| - Gelbič, Ivan
- Peško, Juraj
- Šebesta, Oldřich
|
| http://linked.open...n/vavai/riv/zamer
| |
| issn
| |
| number of pages
| |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)