A reply to Timmer's Comment (Phys.Rev.Lett.85,2647,2000) is given, emphasizing that the statistical and physical plausibility of proposed stochastic alternatives to the hypothesis of a nonlinear oscillator should be carefully assessed.
A reply to Timmer's Comment (Phys.Rev.Lett.85,2647,2000) is given, emphasizing that the statistical and physical plausibility of proposed stochastic alternatives to the hypothesis of a nonlinear oscillator should be carefully assessed. (en)