| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| Description
| - Pro modelové oblasti CHKO Křivoklátsko, CHKO Třeboňsko, CHKO a NP Šumava byla provedena komparativní empirická studie s cílem zachytit vztah mezi ochranou přírody a rozvojem obcí v kontextu regionálního rozvoje. Byla testována hypotéza, zda jsou tato území díky zvýšené formě ochrany přírody výrazně socio-ekonomicky znevýhodněna vůči svému okolí. Hodnocení socio-ekonomických podmínek bylo založeno na analýze dat z databází Českého statistického úřadu, které charakterizovaly základní socio-demografické charakteristiky obyvatel, vybrané parametry kvality života a využití území. Dále pak bylo toto hodnocení doplněno analýzou spokojenosti místní populace s vlastním každodenním životem a socio-ekonomickou situací v chráněných územích včetně jejích názorů a postojů k ochraně přírody. Tato data byla získána dotazníkovým sociologickým šetřením. (cs)
- Protected landscape areas are primarily aimed to conserve nature on their territory. In Central Europe, areas having a status of being protected cannot be considered pristine landscapes. On the contrary, they are cultural landscapes having passed century long cultivation by human activities. Furthermore, they have been permanently populated. As a result nature protection measures should count with needs of local population in order not to make areas under protection a priori disadvantaged from socio-economic viewpoint. There is still open question if such a balance can be ever achieved. The focal point of this article is to discuss whether or not, or to which extent, nature protection can be considered a factor differentiating level or speed of regional socio-economic development. We decided to use empirical evidence in order to test the historical belief as to that nature protection poses limits to economic development that may lead to stagnation if not decline in areas
- Protected landscape areas are primarily aimed to conserve nature on their territory. In Central Europe, areas having a status of being protected cannot be considered pristine landscapes. On the contrary, they are cultural landscapes having passed century long cultivation by human activities. Furthermore, they have been permanently populated. As a result nature protection measures should count with needs of local population in order not to make areas under protection a priori disadvantaged from socio-economic viewpoint. There is still open question if such a balance can be ever achieved. The focal point of this article is to discuss whether or not, or to which extent, nature protection can be considered a factor differentiating level or speed of regional socio-economic development. We decided to use empirical evidence in order to test the historical belief as to that nature protection poses limits to economic development that may lead to stagnation if not decline in areas (en)
|
| Title
| - Nature protection and socio-economic development in selected protected landscape areas
- Ochrana přírody a socio-ekonomický rozvoj ve vybraných chráněných krajinných oblastech (cs)
- Nature protection and socio-economic development in selected protected landscape areas (en)
|
| skos:prefLabel
| - Nature protection and socio-economic development in selected protected landscape areas
- Ochrana přírody a socio-ekonomický rozvoj ve vybraných chráněných krajinných oblastech (cs)
- Nature protection and socio-economic development in selected protected landscape areas (en)
|
| skos:notation
| - RIV/67179843:_____/05:00043921!RIV07-AV0-67179843
|
| http://linked.open.../vavai/riv/strany
| |
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
| |
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
| - P(SM/610/3/03), Z(AV0Z60870520)
|
| http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
| |
| http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
| |
| http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
| |
| http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
| |
| http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
| - RIV/67179843:_____/05:00043921
|
| http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
| - protected landscape areas; nature protection; biosphere reserves; socio-economic development (en)
|
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
| |
| http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
| |
| http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
| |
| http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
| |
| http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
| |
| http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
| |
| http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
| - Bartoš, Michael
- Kušová, Drahomíra
- Těšitel, Jan
- Matějka, K.
|
| http://linked.open...n/vavai/riv/zamer
| |
| issn
| |
| number of pages
| |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)