Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
Description
| - In this article, I state some parallels between naturalist mysterianism in the philosophy of mind (NM) and strict trinitarian mysterianism in theology (ST). In the first part, I characterize the hard problem of consciousness (HP): the problem of how consciousness can be natural; mysterianism about consciousness (M): humans cannot know that; and naturalism about consciousness (N): consciousness is natural. NM, defended by Colin McGinn, is the conjunction of N and M. I undermine McGinn's argument for M and develop another one. I explain why M is no strong evidence against N. In the second part, I find an analogue of NM in ST. I characterize the logical problem of the Trinity (LP): the problem of how God can be triune; and strict mysterianism about the Trinity (S): humans cannot know that (without a vision from God). Consider?ing the claim that God is triune (T), ST is the conjunction of S and T. I find ST to be stated by Vojtěch Šanda. I undermine Šanda's philosophical argument for S and develop another one, parallel to the one I develop for M. Finally I explain why S is no strong evidence against T.
- In this article, I state some parallels between naturalist mysterianism in the philosophy of mind (NM) and strict trinitarian mysterianism in theology (ST). In the first part, I characterize the hard problem of consciousness (HP): the problem of how consciousness can be natural; mysterianism about consciousness (M): humans cannot know that; and naturalism about consciousness (N): consciousness is natural. NM, defended by Colin McGinn, is the conjunction of N and M. I undermine McGinn's argument for M and develop another one. I explain why M is no strong evidence against N. In the second part, I find an analogue of NM in ST. I characterize the logical problem of the Trinity (LP): the problem of how God can be triune; and strict mysterianism about the Trinity (S): humans cannot know that (without a vision from God). Consider?ing the claim that God is triune (T), ST is the conjunction of S and T. I find ST to be stated by Vojtěch Šanda. I undermine Šanda's philosophical argument for S and develop another one, parallel to the one I develop for M. Finally I explain why S is no strong evidence against T. (en)
|
Title
| - Mysterianism about Consciousness and the Trinity
- Mysterianism about Consciousness and the Trinity (en)
|
skos:prefLabel
| - Mysterianism about Consciousness and the Trinity
- Mysterianism about Consciousness and the Trinity (en)
|
skos:notation
| - RIV/61989592:15260/13:33147750!RIV14-MSM-15260___
|
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
| |
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
| |
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
| |
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
| |
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
| |
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
| |
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
| |
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
| - RIV/61989592:15260/13:33147750
|
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
| |
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
| - Šanda, Vojtěch (1873-1953); McGinn, Colin (*1950); the logical problem of the Trinity; the hard problem of consciousness; mysterianism (en)
|
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
| |
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
| |
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
| |
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
| - Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis, Facultas Theologica, Theologica
|
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
| |
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
| |
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
| |
issn
| |
number of pages
| |
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
| |