About: Similar Long-Term Benefits Conferred by Apical Versus Mid-Septal Implantation of the Right Ventricular Lead in Recipients of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Systems

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Similar Long-Term Benefits Conferred by Apical Versus Mid-Septal Implantation of the Right Ventricular Lead in Recipients of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Systems Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	skos:Concept http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek
Description	Introduction: The benefits conffered by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are markedly influenced by the left ventricular (LV) lead placement. Little is known regarding the optimal right ventricular (RV) stimulation site. Study Objective: To compare the long-term outcomes of CRT in patients with RV leads placed in the mid-septal region versus the apex. Methods and Results: This nonrandomized, observational study included 117 patients with standard indications for CRT. The LV lead was implanted on the postero-lateral or lateral LV wall, while the RV lead was implanted at the apex (n = 82) or in the mid-septum (n = 35). Both groups were similar with respect to baseline clinical, demographic, and echocardiographic characteristics. After 12 months of CRT, the rates of clinical response to CRT were similar in both groups (63% vs. 66%), and similar degrees of reverse LV remodelling and LV resynchronization were observed on echocardiography and color tissue Doppler imaging. A >= 30% relative incre Introduction: The benefits conffered by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are markedly influenced by the left ventricular (LV) lead placement. Little is known regarding the optimal right ventricular (RV) stimulation site. Study Objective: To compare the long-term outcomes of CRT in patients with RV leads placed in the mid-septal region versus the apex. Methods and Results: This nonrandomized, observational study included 117 patients with standard indications for CRT. The LV lead was implanted on the postero-lateral or lateral LV wall, while the RV lead was implanted at the apex (n = 82) or in the mid-septum (n = 35). Both groups were similar with respect to baseline clinical, demographic, and echocardiographic characteristics. After 12 months of CRT, the rates of clinical response to CRT were similar in both groups (63% vs. 66%), and similar degrees of reverse LV remodelling and LV resynchronization were observed on echocardiography and color tissue Doppler imaging. A >= 30% relative incre (en)
Title	Similar Long-Term Benefits Conferred by Apical Versus Mid-Septal Implantation of the Right Ventricular Lead in Recipients of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Systems Similar Long-Term Benefits Conferred by Apical Versus Mid-Septal Implantation of the Right Ventricular Lead in Recipients of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Systems (en)
skos:prefLabel	Similar Long-Term Benefits Conferred by Apical Versus Mid-Septal Implantation of the Right Ventricular Lead in Recipients of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Systems Similar Long-Term Benefits Conferred by Apical Versus Mid-Septal Implantation of the Right Ventricular Lead in Recipients of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Systems (en)
skos:notation	RIV/61989592:15110/09:00009627!RIV10-MSM-15110___
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita	S
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity	S
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika	S 1
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat	2010
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku	Bulava, Alan Lukl, Jan
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku	J - Článek v odborném periodiku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju	S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje nepodléhající ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele	Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci / Lékařská fakulta
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku	341196
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku	RIV/61989592:15110/09:00009627
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku	eng - angličtina
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova	key words: cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; right ventricular stimulation; left ventricular stimulation; septal pacing; reverse cardiac remodelling (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo	key words: cardiac resynchronization therapy left ventricular stimulation reverse cardiac remodelling right ventricular stimulation heart failure septal pacing
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele	US - Spojené státy americké
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV	[30ECE5C2100C]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje	Pacing Clinical Electrophysiology
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor	FA
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku	2 (xsd:int)
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku	2 (xsd:int)
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku	2009
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika	32
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku	Bulava, Alan Lukl, Jan
issn	0147-8389
number of pages	6 (xsd:int)
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka	15110

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 58 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software