About: Comparing Regions´ Ranking by MCDM methods: the Case of Visegrad Countries

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Comparing Regions´ Ranking by MCDM methods: the Case of Visegrad Countries Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	skos:Concept http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek
rdfs:seeAlso	http://wseas.org/wseas/cms.action?id=7655
Description	The paper solves the problem of an alternative access to quantitative evaluating of differences in the level of socio-economic development of regions in Visegrad Four countries (V4). The aim of the paper is to define the position of NUTS 2 regions in the period 2000-2010 by utilizing methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preferences by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The sense of applying the methods will be setting the rank and mutual positions of NUTS 2 regions reflecting their socioeconomic development reached for the year 2000, 2005, 2010 based on selected regional data (criterion). The AHP, SAW and TOPSIS are concrete multicriteria decision-making methods (MCDM) which use the hierarchy of elements and ranking the alternatives according to utility and distance functions. Based on the application of methods we can gain detailed view on the regional development of regions by way of quantitative multidimensional characteristics which can lead to more precise evaluation of the socioeconomic disparities among NUTS 2 regions. The paper solves the problem of an alternative access to quantitative evaluating of differences in the level of socio-economic development of regions in Visegrad Four countries (V4). The aim of the paper is to define the position of NUTS 2 regions in the period 2000-2010 by utilizing methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preferences by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The sense of applying the methods will be setting the rank and mutual positions of NUTS 2 regions reflecting their socioeconomic development reached for the year 2000, 2005, 2010 based on selected regional data (criterion). The AHP, SAW and TOPSIS are concrete multicriteria decision-making methods (MCDM) which use the hierarchy of elements and ranking the alternatives according to utility and distance functions. Based on the application of methods we can gain detailed view on the regional development of regions by way of quantitative multidimensional characteristics which can lead to more precise evaluation of the socioeconomic disparities among NUTS 2 regions. (en)
Title	Comparing Regions´ Ranking by MCDM methods: the Case of Visegrad Countries Comparing Regions´ Ranking by MCDM methods: the Case of Visegrad Countries (en)
skos:prefLabel	Comparing Regions´ Ranking by MCDM methods: the Case of Visegrad Countries Comparing Regions´ Ranking by MCDM methods: the Case of Visegrad Countries (en)
skos:notation	RIV/61989100:27510/14:86090625!RIV15-MSM-27510___
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita	P S
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity	P(EE2.3.20.0296), S
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika	11
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat	2015
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku	Poledníková, Eva
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku	J - Článek v odborném periodiku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju	S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje nepodléhající ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele	Vysoká škola báňská - Technická univerzita Ostrava / Ekonomická fakulta
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku	7986
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku	RIV/61989100:27510/14:86090625
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku	eng - angličtina
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova	Visegrad Four; TOPSIS; SAW; Regional disparities; Pairwise comparison; Multicriteria decision-making methods; Cohesion policy; AHP (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo	Visegrad Four SAW AHP TOPSIS Cohesion policy Regional disparities Multicriteria decision-making methods Pairwise comparison
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele	US - Spojené státy americké
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV	[8A9DF9625224]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje	WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor	AH
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku	1 (xsd:int)
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku	1 (xsd:int)
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt	Research team for modelling of economic and financial processes at VSB-TU Ostrava
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku	2014
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika	Neuveden
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku	Poledníková, Eva
issn	1109-9526
number of pages	12 (xsd:int)
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka	27510

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 67 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software