About: Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:seeAlso
Description
  • The use of model caterpillars to assess relative rates of predation has risen in popularity in recent years. However, there currently exists no detailed information on how to assign attack marks to particular predators. We aimed to address this gap by collating a comprehensive reference collection of the types of marks made by different predators to serve as a guide for researchers wanting to identify the predators responsible for attacks. To determine what level of resolution in identification may be considered reliable, we also tested the consistency of predator assignments made by different individuals. We found that predator identification at a coarse taxonomic level (i.e., bird, mammal, arthropod) was reasonably consistent. In contrast, when more fine-scale identification was attempted, the level of consistency and therefore also confidence in the accuracy of an identification was dramatically reduced, reflecting the difficulty of distinguishing between attacks made not only by different arthropod groups but also by differently sized birds and mammals. We recommend that identifications be made at a coarse taxonomic level and, where possible, by multiple researchers or team members. We also suggest that our collection of images of representative attack marks from each of the coarse predator categories, and descriptions of their defining characteristics, can serve as a guide to assist with identifications and this will be complemented by a good knowledge of the locally occurring and abundant predators.
  • The use of model caterpillars to assess relative rates of predation has risen in popularity in recent years. However, there currently exists no detailed information on how to assign attack marks to particular predators. We aimed to address this gap by collating a comprehensive reference collection of the types of marks made by different predators to serve as a guide for researchers wanting to identify the predators responsible for attacks. To determine what level of resolution in identification may be considered reliable, we also tested the consistency of predator assignments made by different individuals. We found that predator identification at a coarse taxonomic level (i.e., bird, mammal, arthropod) was reasonably consistent. In contrast, when more fine-scale identification was attempted, the level of consistency and therefore also confidence in the accuracy of an identification was dramatically reduced, reflecting the difficulty of distinguishing between attacks made not only by different arthropod groups but also by differently sized birds and mammals. We recommend that identifications be made at a coarse taxonomic level and, where possible, by multiple researchers or team members. We also suggest that our collection of images of representative attack marks from each of the coarse predator categories, and descriptions of their defining characteristics, can serve as a guide to assist with identifications and this will be complemented by a good knowledge of the locally occurring and abundant predators. (en)
Title
  • Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice
  • Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice
  • Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/60077344:_____/14:00429600!RIV15-GA0-60077344
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • I, P(GA206/09/0115), P(GD206/08/H044), S
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
  • 2
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 10876
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/60077344:_____/14:00429600
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • artificial prey; attack marks; insect herbivores (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
  • US - Spojené státy americké
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [55412C8D07EE]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
  • Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
  • 152
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Hochuli, D. F.
  • Löw, P. A.
  • McArthur, C.
  • Posa, M. R. C.
  • Sam, Kateřina
http://linked.open...ain/vavai/riv/wos
  • 000339663200004
issn
  • 0013-8703
number of pages
http://bibframe.org/vocab/doi
  • 10.1111/eea.12207
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 112 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software