About: Validation of current acoustic dead-zone estimation methods in lakes with strongly sloped bottoms     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
Description
  • Inland water bodies contain extremely steep-sloped bottoms compared with those typically occurring during marine vertical surveys. These steep bottom slopes can cause high acoustic dead zones, biasing our estimates of living organisms. The studies so far have used the assumption that the first contact between the acoustic wavefront and bottom will be at the point where the radial ray from the transducer is normal to the bottom (90°), which we refer to as the normal ray assumption (NRA). Nevertheless, as acoustic energy dramatically decreases laterally due to the beam's pattern, this assumption may not be fulfilled further from the acoustic axis. It is reasonable to believe that the methods assuming the NRA can fail at quite steep slopes. We installed a calibration benthic gillnet of known height at sites with different bottom slopes, ranging from 12° to 50°. The gillnet's float-line served as a good visible marker above the monitored lake bottom and was successfully used for measuring the acoustic dead-zone height empirically. By comparing the observed and modeled dead zones based on the NRA, we can show that the current methods for their estimation are invalid at quite sloping angles. We conclude that the current dead-zone estimation methods are not always applicable for surveying inland water bodies with extremely steep bottom slopes. Installing a simple calibration net as an off-bottom marker can provide help for in-situ dead-zone measurements.
  • Inland water bodies contain extremely steep-sloped bottoms compared with those typically occurring during marine vertical surveys. These steep bottom slopes can cause high acoustic dead zones, biasing our estimates of living organisms. The studies so far have used the assumption that the first contact between the acoustic wavefront and bottom will be at the point where the radial ray from the transducer is normal to the bottom (90°), which we refer to as the normal ray assumption (NRA). Nevertheless, as acoustic energy dramatically decreases laterally due to the beam's pattern, this assumption may not be fulfilled further from the acoustic axis. It is reasonable to believe that the methods assuming the NRA can fail at quite steep slopes. We installed a calibration benthic gillnet of known height at sites with different bottom slopes, ranging from 12° to 50°. The gillnet's float-line served as a good visible marker above the monitored lake bottom and was successfully used for measuring the acoustic dead-zone height empirically. By comparing the observed and modeled dead zones based on the NRA, we can show that the current methods for their estimation are invalid at quite sloping angles. We conclude that the current dead-zone estimation methods are not always applicable for surveying inland water bodies with extremely steep bottom slopes. Installing a simple calibration net as an off-bottom marker can provide help for in-situ dead-zone measurements. (en)
Title
  • Validation of current acoustic dead-zone estimation methods in lakes with strongly sloped bottoms
  • Validation of current acoustic dead-zone estimation methods in lakes with strongly sloped bottoms (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • Validation of current acoustic dead-zone estimation methods in lakes with strongly sloped bottoms
  • Validation of current acoustic dead-zone estimation methods in lakes with strongly sloped bottoms (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/60077344:_____/11:00370330!RIV12-AV0-60077344
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • P(GA206/07/1392), V, Z(AV0Z60170517)
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
  • -
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 237839
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/60077344:_____/11:00370330
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • acoustic dead zone; bottom slope; lentic freshwater habitats (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
  • US - Spojené státy americké
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [D1C9266EC707]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
  • LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY-METHODS
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
  • 9
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Kubečka, Jan
  • Čech, Martin
  • Frouzová, Jaroslava
  • Tušer, Michal
  • Muška, Milan
  • Balk, H.
  • Mrkvička, T.
http://linked.open...ain/vavai/riv/wos
  • 000300377800010
http://linked.open...n/vavai/riv/zamer
issn
  • 1541-5856
number of pages
http://bibframe.org/vocab/doi
  • 10.4319/lom.2011.9.507
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 112 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software