About: Comparison of numerical simulation and experiment in case of bending test of composite rectangular tubes     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
Description
  • The design of a composite footbridge using a finite element method (FEM) model is the aim of the research project TA02010501. A box beam concept is used in the footbridge design. To validate the FEM model, bending tests of composite rectangular tubes were done. The aim of this work was to compare the failure of the tubes in case of the FEM model and the experiment and to determine a safety coefficient for the load capacity evaluation of the footbridge. Two types of samples were tested. Sample A consisted of two outer chopped strand mat (CSM) layers and two inner unidirectional (UD) layers. Sample B consisted of six biaxial non-crimp fabric (NCF) layers. Performed tests were numerically simulated using the Abaqus 6.12 finite element system. The maximum stress theory was used to determine failure. Analyses with and without large deformation assumption were compared. The type of the deformation assumption did not significantly influence results of the model of the sample B. However, significant differences were observed in case of the sample A. A local buckling of the sample A before its failure was the reason. Based on comparison of ultimate forces in experiments and models, it was determined that the value of the safety coefficient for the load capacity evaluation of the footbridge should not be less than 3.
  • The design of a composite footbridge using a finite element method (FEM) model is the aim of the research project TA02010501. A box beam concept is used in the footbridge design. To validate the FEM model, bending tests of composite rectangular tubes were done. The aim of this work was to compare the failure of the tubes in case of the FEM model and the experiment and to determine a safety coefficient for the load capacity evaluation of the footbridge. Two types of samples were tested. Sample A consisted of two outer chopped strand mat (CSM) layers and two inner unidirectional (UD) layers. Sample B consisted of six biaxial non-crimp fabric (NCF) layers. Performed tests were numerically simulated using the Abaqus 6.12 finite element system. The maximum stress theory was used to determine failure. Analyses with and without large deformation assumption were compared. The type of the deformation assumption did not significantly influence results of the model of the sample B. However, significant differences were observed in case of the sample A. A local buckling of the sample A before its failure was the reason. Based on comparison of ultimate forces in experiments and models, it was determined that the value of the safety coefficient for the load capacity evaluation of the footbridge should not be less than 3. (en)
Title
  • Comparison of numerical simulation and experiment in case of bending test of composite rectangular tubes
  • Comparison of numerical simulation and experiment in case of bending test of composite rectangular tubes (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • Comparison of numerical simulation and experiment in case of bending test of composite rectangular tubes
  • Comparison of numerical simulation and experiment in case of bending test of composite rectangular tubes (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/49777513:23520/14:43923038!RIV15-TA0-23520___
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • P(TA02010501)
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 8144
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/49777513:23520/14:43923038
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • bending test, finite element method; rectangular tube; composite; footbridge (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [80484B128CAE]
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Kottner, Radek
  • Krystek, Jan
  • Bek, Lukáš
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
  • 23520
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 58 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software