| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| Description
| - The reach of negative impact is depends on quantity and character of transported substance, actual meteorological situation and on recipient sensitivity to negative effects (toxicity, fire, explosion). Gas dispersion in the atmosphere boundary layer is strongly dependent on weather conditions (atmosphere stability, wind speed and direction). Bandwidth exposure assessment is complicated because of large differences in concentration values. The reach radius of effects may vary in number of digits in respective value. That is why the occurrence frequency has to be respected for single situations by bandwidth assessment. There are different negative effects like most often toxicity, thermal radiation and/or shock wave. Sensitivity of human and environment elements to these effects is different. Therefore we need to conduct various methods of consequences assessment. In simple cases the criteria is the substance concentration in respective point in the atmosphere. However the exposure dose is used more often. Where adequate pieces of data are available, it is possible to apply the probit functions. Recipient vulnerability formulation has usually probability character. Every population contains more or less fragile individuals and exact conditions of exposure may differ for single subjects. That is why it has to be defined the boundary effects and criteria, e.g. human death by toxic exposure or vegetation damage by fire. The bandwidth is determined on the basis of defined effect probability threshold limit, e.g. 1% of human death probability. It stands to reason, that by the risk evaluation for more recipients, we get a various values of effects threshold limits criteria.
- The reach of negative impact is depends on quantity and character of transported substance, actual meteorological situation and on recipient sensitivity to negative effects (toxicity, fire, explosion). Gas dispersion in the atmosphere boundary layer is strongly dependent on weather conditions (atmosphere stability, wind speed and direction). Bandwidth exposure assessment is complicated because of large differences in concentration values. The reach radius of effects may vary in number of digits in respective value. That is why the occurrence frequency has to be respected for single situations by bandwidth assessment. There are different negative effects like most often toxicity, thermal radiation and/or shock wave. Sensitivity of human and environment elements to these effects is different. Therefore we need to conduct various methods of consequences assessment. In simple cases the criteria is the substance concentration in respective point in the atmosphere. However the exposure dose is used more often. Where adequate pieces of data are available, it is possible to apply the probit functions. Recipient vulnerability formulation has usually probability character. Every population contains more or less fragile individuals and exact conditions of exposure may differ for single subjects. That is why it has to be defined the boundary effects and criteria, e.g. human death by toxic exposure or vegetation damage by fire. The bandwidth is determined on the basis of defined effect probability threshold limit, e.g. 1% of human death probability. It stands to reason, that by the risk evaluation for more recipients, we get a various values of effects threshold limits criteria. (en)
|
| Title
| - Individual and social risk assessment for toxic gas outflow by road transport
- Individual and social risk assessment for toxic gas outflow by road transport (en)
|
| skos:prefLabel
| - Individual and social risk assessment for toxic gas outflow by road transport
- Individual and social risk assessment for toxic gas outflow by road transport (en)
|
| skos:notation
| - RIV/46747885:24220/12:#0002245!RIV13-MSM-24220___
|
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
| |
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
| |
| http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
| |
| http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
| |
| http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
| |
| http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
| - RIV/46747885:24220/12:#0002245
|
| http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
| - bandwidth; individual risk; social risk; toxicity; gas; road transport (en)
|
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
| |
| http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
| |
| http://linked.open...v/mistoKonaniAkce
| |
| http://linked.open...i/riv/mistoVydani
| |
| http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
| - 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, PSAM11 ESREL 2012
|
| http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
| |
| http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...vavai/riv/typAkce
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/zahajeniAkce
| |
| number of pages
| |
| http://purl.org/ne...btex#hasPublisher
| |
| https://schema.org/isbn
| |
| http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
| |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)