Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
Description
| - The chapter compares the legitimacy of and support for the social protection systems in the Czech Republic and the Netherlands. It attempts to discern how the different economic and socio-political conditions of the transformation of the two countries social systems affect the general level of citizens support for and solidarity with the framework of the system. In addition, it also seeks to discover whether the changes in and the current state of affairs of the transformed social protection systems are thought to be legitimate by each country citizens. In the 1990s, the social protection transformation policies in the Netherlands and the Czech Republic followed the same trend: aiming to restrict and control the system expenditures. In this respect, the state-guaranteed collective protection system is fading; at the same time, the new systems increasingly favor selective and individual-based benefits targeting. In both countries, this development raises important issues concerning the entitlement crit
- The chapter compares the legitimacy of and support for the social protection systems in the Czech Republic and the Netherlands. It attempts to discern how the different economic and socio-political conditions of the transformation of the two countries social systems affect the general level of citizens support for and solidarity with the framework of the system. In addition, it also seeks to discover whether the changes in and the current state of affairs of the transformed social protection systems are thought to be legitimate by each country citizens. In the 1990s, the social protection transformation policies in the Netherlands and the Czech Republic followed the same trend: aiming to restrict and control the system expenditures. In this respect, the state-guaranteed collective protection system is fading; at the same time, the new systems increasingly favor selective and individual-based benefits targeting. In both countries, this development raises important issues concerning the entitlement crit (en)
- The chapter compares the legitimacy of and support for the social protection systems in the Czech Republic and the Netherlands. It attempts to discern how the different economic and socio-political conditions of the transformation of the two countries social systems affect the general level of citizens support for and solidarity with the framework of the system. In addition, it also seeks to discover whether the changes in and the current state of affairs of the transformed social protection systems are thought to be legitimate by each country citizens. In the 1990s, the social protection transformation policies in the Netherlands and the Czech Republic followed the same trend: aiming to restrict and control the system expenditures. In this respect, the state-guaranteed collective protection system is fading; at the same time, the new systems increasingly favor selective and individual-based benefits targeting. In both countries, this development raises important issues concerning the entitlement crit (cs)
|
Title
| - Welfare state solidarity and support: the Czech Republic compared with the Netherlands
- Welfare state solidarity and support: the Czech Republic compared with the Netherlands (en)
- Welfare state solidarity and support: the Czech Republic compared with the Netherlands (cs)
|
skos:prefLabel
| - Welfare state solidarity and support: the Czech Republic compared with the Netherlands
- Welfare state solidarity and support: the Czech Republic compared with the Netherlands (en)
- Welfare state solidarity and support: the Czech Republic compared with the Netherlands (cs)
|
skos:notation
| - RIV/00216224:14230/02:00006412!RIV08-MSM-14230___
|
http://linked.open.../vavai/riv/strany
| |
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
| |
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
| |
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
| |
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
| |
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
| |
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
| |
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
| - RIV/00216224:14230/02:00006412
|
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
| |
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
| - welfare state; social solidarity; social security; public opinion (en)
|
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
| |
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
| |
http://linked.open...i/riv/mistoVydani
| |
http://linked.open...vEdiceCisloSvazku
| |
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
| - World Poverty (edited by Peter Townsend and David Gordon)
|
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
| |
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
| |
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
| - Sirovátka, Tomáš
- Rabušic, Ladislav
- van Oorschot, Wim
|
http://linked.open...n/vavai/riv/zamer
| |
number of pages
| |
http://purl.org/ne...btex#hasPublisher
| |
https://schema.org/isbn
| |
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
| |