| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:seeAlso
| |
| Description
| - We present a story of a double turn: first, the turn toward deliberative procedures orchestrated by the implementer; this turn came after the initial period of expert driven decision making had led to public protests and failed. Second, we describe a turn back toward more authoritative and technocratic decision making after several-years long attempt at %22technical democracy%22, to use this famous term (Callon, Lascoumes & Barthe 2009), did not bring expected results quickly enough. While the former kind of turn appears relatively frequently in literature, the latter does not seem to be discussed too often - although similar failures may not be so rare. We want to show that a misunderstanding about the meaning of the notion of %22socio-technical%22 can be seen behind the described double turn. Socio-technical, at least as far as its STS origin implies, does not mean simply just adding a list of %22social issues%22 to the technical agenda. Instead (and in accordance to the work done within STS), the notion of socio-technical refers to analytical determination to approach and understand social and technical processes together, as a single network, i.e., going hand in hand, inseparably (i.e., Callon 1991; Latour 1991 and elsewhere). Something like this, of course, is hard to translate into policy practices and formalized public involvement - which is valid even more for policy cultures that have remained practically untouched by %22the emerging interest in scientific citizenship today and multiple new forms of public participation in science and technology%22 and in which scientific expertise still very much enjoys the status of politically neutral authority, external to societal life. In a way, we are convinced that the siting process in the Czech Republic has fallen victim to the simplified understanding of what %22socio-technical%22 means for technical democracy in the making.
- We present a story of a double turn: first, the turn toward deliberative procedures orchestrated by the implementer; this turn came after the initial period of expert driven decision making had led to public protests and failed. Second, we describe a turn back toward more authoritative and technocratic decision making after several-years long attempt at %22technical democracy%22, to use this famous term (Callon, Lascoumes & Barthe 2009), did not bring expected results quickly enough. While the former kind of turn appears relatively frequently in literature, the latter does not seem to be discussed too often - although similar failures may not be so rare. We want to show that a misunderstanding about the meaning of the notion of %22socio-technical%22 can be seen behind the described double turn. Socio-technical, at least as far as its STS origin implies, does not mean simply just adding a list of %22social issues%22 to the technical agenda. Instead (and in accordance to the work done within STS), the notion of socio-technical refers to analytical determination to approach and understand social and technical processes together, as a single network, i.e., going hand in hand, inseparably (i.e., Callon 1991; Latour 1991 and elsewhere). Something like this, of course, is hard to translate into policy practices and formalized public involvement - which is valid even more for policy cultures that have remained practically untouched by %22the emerging interest in scientific citizenship today and multiple new forms of public participation in science and technology%22 and in which scientific expertise still very much enjoys the status of politically neutral authority, external to societal life. In a way, we are convinced that the siting process in the Czech Republic has fallen victim to the simplified understanding of what %22socio-technical%22 means for technical democracy in the making. (en)
|
| Title
| - Siting the Nuclear Waste Repository in the Czech Republic: Twists and Turns Towards Technical Democracy
- Siting the Nuclear Waste Repository in the Czech Republic: Twists and Turns Towards Technical Democracy (en)
|
| skos:prefLabel
| - Siting the Nuclear Waste Repository in the Czech Republic: Twists and Turns Towards Technical Democracy
- Siting the Nuclear Waste Repository in the Czech Republic: Twists and Turns Towards Technical Democracy (en)
|
| skos:notation
| - RIV/00216208:11620/14:10284933!RIV15-MSM-11620___
|
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
| |
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
| |
| http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
| |
| http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
| |
| http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
| |
| http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
| - RIV/00216208:11620/14:10284933
|
| http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
| - the public; dialogue; controversy; siting; geological repository; nuclear waste management; socio-technical (en)
|
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
| |
| http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
| |
| http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
| |
| http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
| |
| http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
| - Konopásek, Zdeněk
- Svačina, Karel
|
| http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
| |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)