About: Impact of the Bologna process two-cycle implementation on teacher education in the Czech Republic     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
Description
  • As a consequence of the Bologna process, five-year master's teacher education programmes have been divided into three-year bachelor's and two-year master's studies in the Czech Republic. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of the two-cycle implementation in teacher education programmes in the Czech Republic and present survey results about the opinions of both the academic staff and students at the Faculty of Education of Charles University in Prague on the implementation. In the irst and second parts, we summarize Bologna goals and reaction to the two-cycle implementation in general. In the third part, we analyze the two-cycle system implementation from its introduction into the Czech legal system to a recent successful re-accreditation of a one-cycle programme at one faculty of education and strengthening voices for reintroduction of a one-cycle system for teacher education. In the fourth part, we present the survey results. It has been shown that about nine out of ten staff members had disagreed with the two-cycle implementation at the time of its introduction in 2006, and there has been no significant change of their opinions over time. Moreover, more than sixty percent of the academic staff do not agree with the co-existence of the two systems. On the contrary, students prefer the two-cycle system to the one-cycle system (7:3). Most bachelor's students intend to continue in the follow-up master's study suggesting that the division is more or less formal.
  • As a consequence of the Bologna process, five-year master's teacher education programmes have been divided into three-year bachelor's and two-year master's studies in the Czech Republic. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of the two-cycle implementation in teacher education programmes in the Czech Republic and present survey results about the opinions of both the academic staff and students at the Faculty of Education of Charles University in Prague on the implementation. In the irst and second parts, we summarize Bologna goals and reaction to the two-cycle implementation in general. In the third part, we analyze the two-cycle system implementation from its introduction into the Czech legal system to a recent successful re-accreditation of a one-cycle programme at one faculty of education and strengthening voices for reintroduction of a one-cycle system for teacher education. In the fourth part, we present the survey results. It has been shown that about nine out of ten staff members had disagreed with the two-cycle implementation at the time of its introduction in 2006, and there has been no significant change of their opinions over time. Moreover, more than sixty percent of the academic staff do not agree with the co-existence of the two systems. On the contrary, students prefer the two-cycle system to the one-cycle system (7:3). Most bachelor's students intend to continue in the follow-up master's study suggesting that the division is more or less formal. (en)
Title
  • Impact of the Bologna process two-cycle implementation on teacher education in the Czech Republic
  • Impact of the Bologna process two-cycle implementation on teacher education in the Czech Republic (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • Impact of the Bologna process two-cycle implementation on teacher education in the Czech Republic
  • Impact of the Bologna process two-cycle implementation on teacher education in the Czech Republic (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/00216208:11410/13:10190354!RIV14-MSM-11410___
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • Z(MSM0021620862)
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
  • 6
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 79055
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/00216208:11410/13:10190354
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • five-year master's study; follow-up master's study; bachelor's study; two-cycle system; Bologna process; Teacher education (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
  • CZ - Česká republika
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [E03F51376B12]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
  • Pedagogická orientace
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
  • 23
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Bendl, Stanislav
  • Voňková, Hana
  • Zvírotský, Michal
http://linked.open...n/vavai/riv/zamer
issn
  • 1211-4669
number of pages
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
  • 11410
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 38 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software