About: Similarities and differences in the ilia of Late Cretaceous anurans and urodeles     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
Description
  • Screen-washing of matrix from 37 Upper Cretaceous microvertebrate localities in southern Utah, USA, yielded a rich sample of anuran disarticulated bones, including nearly 200 ilia. Because the bones are relatively small and delicate and were subject to pre-mortem transport and unavoidable, damage when the fossiliferous matrix was collected and processed, none of the recovered ilia retained intact shafts. This means that features such as the form of the anterior end of the shaft and the presence and form of a dorsal crest cannot be used to identify the fossils. Urodele bones also are known from many of the same localities. When anuran and urodele ilia are isolated and missing much of their shafts, they are superficially similar, so it was important to reliably differentiate ilia of the two groups. Here we provide a list and brief descriptions of some of the features that we found useful for distinguishing between anuran and urodele ilia. These features relate to differences between the two groups in muscle attachments, contacts between pelvic bones, and structure of the acetabula. Because all of the features exhibit some variation, we recommend that they be used in combination when trying to distinguish between anuran and urodele ilia.
  • Screen-washing of matrix from 37 Upper Cretaceous microvertebrate localities in southern Utah, USA, yielded a rich sample of anuran disarticulated bones, including nearly 200 ilia. Because the bones are relatively small and delicate and were subject to pre-mortem transport and unavoidable, damage when the fossiliferous matrix was collected and processed, none of the recovered ilia retained intact shafts. This means that features such as the form of the anterior end of the shaft and the presence and form of a dorsal crest cannot be used to identify the fossils. Urodele bones also are known from many of the same localities. When anuran and urodele ilia are isolated and missing much of their shafts, they are superficially similar, so it was important to reliably differentiate ilia of the two groups. Here we provide a list and brief descriptions of some of the features that we found useful for distinguishing between anuran and urodele ilia. These features relate to differences between the two groups in muscle attachments, contacts between pelvic bones, and structure of the acetabula. Because all of the features exhibit some variation, we recommend that they be used in combination when trying to distinguish between anuran and urodele ilia. (en)
Title
  • Similarities and differences in the ilia of Late Cretaceous anurans and urodeles
  • Similarities and differences in the ilia of Late Cretaceous anurans and urodeles (en)
skos:prefLabel
  • Similarities and differences in the ilia of Late Cretaceous anurans and urodeles
  • Similarities and differences in the ilia of Late Cretaceous anurans and urodeles (en)
skos:notation
  • RIV/00216208:11310/12:10209852!RIV14-MSM-11310___
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • I, P(ME08066)
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
  • 6
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 167876
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/00216208:11310/12:10209852
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • Urodela; Postcranial skeleton; North America; Ilium; Cretaceous; Anura (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
  • FR - Francouzská republika
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [19A44B5D261F]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
  • Bulletin - Societie Geologique de France
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
  • 183
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Přikryl, Tomáš
  • Roček, Zbyněk
  • Eaton, Jeffrey G.
  • Gardner, James D.
http://linked.open...ain/vavai/riv/wos
  • 000316156200006
issn
  • 0037-9409
number of pages
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
  • 11310
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 58 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software