About: Social Welfare Rights and Judicial Review: Czech Republic in Central European Context

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Social Welfare Rights and Judicial Review: Czech Republic in Central European Context Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	skos:Concept http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek
Description	The chapter analyses the judicial review of social welfare rights in the Czech Republic. Generally, the main methodology used by the Czech Constitutional Court for judicial review of fundamental rights is the proportionality test. For review of social and economic rights, however, the Court has developed a special methodology which is largely based on the rational basis review and shows a larger degree of deference towards the legislature. In the view of the Court, this difference in approach is necessary due to a specific nature of social rights which is underlined by a specific constitutional provision. The author argues that although a specific approach might be justified in the cases concerning social rights, the methodology used by the Court is inappropriate and rather a proportionality test should be used. To support this thesis, the constitutional setting and its origins is described, and then a landmark decision concerning the right to free medical care is explored and analyzed. On this basis, the author proposes an alternative approach to judicial review of social rights. The chapter analyses the judicial review of social welfare rights in the Czech Republic. Generally, the main methodology used by the Czech Constitutional Court for judicial review of fundamental rights is the proportionality test. For review of social and economic rights, however, the Court has developed a special methodology which is largely based on the rational basis review and shows a larger degree of deference towards the legislature. In the view of the Court, this difference in approach is necessary due to a specific nature of social rights which is underlined by a specific constitutional provision. The author argues that although a specific approach might be justified in the cases concerning social rights, the methodology used by the Court is inappropriate and rather a proportionality test should be used. To support this thesis, the constitutional setting and its origins is described, and then a landmark decision concerning the right to free medical care is explored and analyzed. On this basis, the author proposes an alternative approach to judicial review of social rights. (en)
Title	Social Welfare Rights and Judicial Review: Czech Republic in Central European Context Social Welfare Rights and Judicial Review: Czech Republic in Central European Context (en)
skos:prefLabel	Social Welfare Rights and Judicial Review: Czech Republic in Central European Context Social Welfare Rights and Judicial Review: Czech Republic in Central European Context (en)
skos:notation	RIV/00216208:11220/14:10284335!RIV15-MSM-11220___
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita	I
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity	I
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat	2015
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku	Antoš, Marek
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku	C - Kapitola v knize
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju	S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje nepodléhající ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele	Univerzita Karlova v Praze / Právnická fakulta
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku	45606
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku	RIV/00216208:11220/14:10284335
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku	eng - angličtina
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova	rational basis review; judicial review; Czech Republic; social welfare rights; social rights (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo	judicial review Czech Republic social rights rational basis review social welfare rights
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV	[55813701EA35]
http://linked.open...i/riv/mistoVydani	Joacaba
http://linked.open...vEdiceCisloSvazku	Neuveden
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje	Mecanismos internacionais e internos de efetividade dos direitos fundamentais
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor	AG
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku	1 (xsd:int)
http://linked.open...v/pocetStranKnihy	576 (xsd:int)
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku	1 (xsd:int)
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku	2014
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku	Antoš, Marek
number of pages	13 (xsd:int)
http://purl.org/ne...btex#hasPublisher	Editora Unoesc
https://schema.org/isbn	978-85-8422-019-9
http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka	11220

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 58 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software