About: Method of sampling and laboratory extraction affects interpretation of grain infestation by storage pests     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/Vysledek, within Data Space : linked.opendata.cz associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
Description
  • Evropská unie prochází procesem sjednocování legislativy. To se také týká protokolů vzorkování obilovin ve vztahu k výskytu skladištních škůdců. Předložená studie se zabývá kvantifikací efektů vzorkovacích metod (povrchová vzorkovací nádoba vs. komorový bodcový vzorkovač /= šachr/) a 2 laboratorních extrakčních metod ( Tullgren vs. automatická síta) na výsledky a interpretaci výše napadení a rozložení populace škůdců ve skladu. Všechny faktory ovlivnily výsledky vzorkování; nejvíce ovlivnila výsledky metoda odběru vzorků. Tato práce ukazuje na nutnost použití stejné metody odběru vzorků a metody extrakce aby získaná data mohla být srovnatelná v rámci inspekcí v EU. (cs)
  • European-Union countries undergo the process of unifying laws. This is also true for protocols designated for monitoring and evaluation of pests and pesticide risks. This study was aimed at exploring whether different methods of sampling and extracting pests would lead to different pest population estimation. We compared two methods of sampling (surface sampling with cup-sampler vs. subsurface sampling with spear-sampler) and two methods of pests' extraction from samples (automated sieving vs. Tullgren apparatus) taken from a highly pest infested flat grain store. Overall eight species of mites, seven species of beetles and two species of psocids were identified. The pest population density ranged between 0-12 individuals per sample (200 g) in psocids, 0-14 in beetles and 2-25060 in mites. Surface sampling with cup-sampler was significantly more effective than sampling using subsurface spear-sampler. The number of trapped species was influenced neither by sampling nor by extracting method. This study
  • European-Union countries undergo the process of unifying laws. This is also true for protocols designated for monitoring and evaluation of pests and pesticide risks. This study was aimed at exploring whether different methods of sampling and extracting pests would lead to different pest population estimation. We compared two methods of sampling (surface sampling with cup-sampler vs. subsurface sampling with spear-sampler) and two methods of pests' extraction from samples (automated sieving vs. Tullgren apparatus) taken from a highly pest infested flat grain store. Overall eight species of mites, seven species of beetles and two species of psocids were identified. The pest population density ranged between 0-12 individuals per sample (200 g) in psocids, 0-14 in beetles and 2-25060 in mites. Surface sampling with cup-sampler was significantly more effective than sampling using subsurface spear-sampler. The number of trapped species was influenced neither by sampling nor by extracting method. This study (en)
Title
  • Method of sampling and laboratory extraction affects interpretation of grain infestation by storage pests
  • Method of sampling and laboratory extraction affects interpretation of grain infestation by storage pests (en)
  • Metoda vzorkování a laboratorní extrakce ovlivňují interpretaci rozsahu infestace obilí skladištními škůdci. (cs)
skos:prefLabel
  • Method of sampling and laboratory extraction affects interpretation of grain infestation by storage pests
  • Method of sampling and laboratory extraction affects interpretation of grain infestation by storage pests (en)
  • Metoda vzorkování a laboratorní extrakce ovlivňují interpretaci rozsahu infestace obilí skladištními škůdci. (cs)
skos:notation
  • RIV/00027006:_____/08:00000196!RIV09-MZE-00027006
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
  • P(QF4071)
http://linked.open...iv/cisloPeriodika
  • 3
http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
  • 378753
http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
  • RIV/00027006:_____/08:00000196
http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
  • detection; insects; IPM; mites; monitoring; stored grain (en)
http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
http://linked.open...odStatuVydavatele
  • DE - Spolková republika Německo
http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
  • [3040E9E0FEB4]
http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
  • Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection
http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
http://linked.open...vavai/riv/projekt
http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
http://linked.open...v/svazekPeriodika
  • 115
http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
  • Aulický, Radek
  • Kučerová, Zuzana
  • Stejskal, Václav
  • Lukáš, Jan
http://linked.open...ain/vavai/riv/wos
  • 000257959200006
issn
  • 1861-3829
number of pages
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.118 as of Jun 21 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3240 as of Jun 21 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 48 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software